Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Pro-Life Movement Ignores The Black Community At Its Peril: Jailed Black Pastor

The pro-life movement ignores the black community at its peril: jailed black pastor

December 6, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – If the pro-life movement is serious about ending abortion in America, it has no option but to start making a deliberate effort to reach out to the black and other minority communities, a prominent black pro-life pastor and his wife told a meeting of pro-life leaders in San Francisco last month.

“Why does black America say ‘no’ to the pro-life movement?” Walter Hoye asked. “The pro-life community has not asked us ‘Why?’ You have no idea why we’re saying no.”

Walter Hoye

Hoye is a pastor in Oakland who was famously so effective at sidewalk counseling outside a local abortion clinic, that the city passed an ordinance to stop his life-saving efforts – an ordinance he has repeatedly flouted, earning himself jail time in the process.

“The strategies that work in my community are different than maybe what will work in the larger pro-life community,” he told the gathered pro-life leaders. “There’s gotta be room at the table to talk about executing strategies that can start a conversation in the communities that are being targeted and are being slaughtered.”

‘A holocaust in our community’

Hoye’s wife, Lori, a trained statistician, pointed to the sobering statistics showing how disproportionately high the abortion rate in the black community is compared to the national average.

“Abortion is the number one cause of death in the African American community,” she said. “We lose over half a million lives in our community to abortion every year. If you combine cancer, heart disease, AIDS, diabetes, and any kind of violent crime, add them all up together, they don’t come even close to the lives we lose to abortion.”

“It’s a holocaust in our community,” she said.

The latest abortion numbers from the CDC, released just days ago, have only served to emphasize her point, showing that while the abortion rate among whites fell between 2007 and 2010, the rate jumped three percent among blacks, and eight percent for Hispanics. 

During those three years nearly 36 percent of all abortions in the U.S. were performed on black children, even though blacks make up only 12.8 percent of the population. Another 21 percent of abortions were performed on Hispanics, and an additional seven percent on other minority races.

‘The brothers are blood guilty’

But the challenges facing a largely white pro-life movement in stemming the tide of abortion among blacks and other minorities are daunting, said Walter Hoye, who outlined four reasons why leaders in the black community, particularly the pastors, are unwilling to speak up about abortion. 

Probably the most insidious and difficult to overcome, he said, is that most black pastors are post-abortion. 

“The brothers are blood guilty,” he said. “There’s an abortion in their life somewhere. It’s their mama, it’s their wife, it may be their son, it may be their daughter. It may be a member of their congregation who they wrote the check for, or even drove to the clinic.” 

Even though they may understand the Biblical arguments against abortion, when Planned Parenthood comes into their community and tells them that the unborn baby isn’t a child but a “choice,” a black pastor “embraces all that because it allows him to sleep at night,” Walter said. “He needs to be healed.” 

But the need for healing presents its own challenges, added Lori, who pointed to the lack of any resources in the black community to provide such healing. It’s also a catch-22, she added, because even when some black pastors have attempted to bring post-abortion healing ministries into their churches, few, if any, women have shown up.

“None of us are going to show up to anything that has that ‘A’ word in it,” she said. “Because the shame level associated with having taken the life of my own child – and I’m sitting in church every week and praising the Lord and thanking him for everything he’s done for me – but I have done something that I can’t live with.”

“You’re dealing with a community that is in pain,” she said. “There’s no outlet.” 

Other reasons black pastors may be unreceptive to the pro-life movement, said Walter, can include outright reverse racism against a predominantly white GOP political class and pro-life leadership, as well the risk that if the pastors do speak up, they may lose their jobs. 

‘Will you help me?’

But Walter said his own experience shows the amazing things that can happen when a single black pastor takes a stand on the issue. 

Before Oakland passed the ordinace preventing him from sidewalk counseling, Walter said he noticed that a surprising number of women were showing up at the abortion clinic on the day he did his counseling – more than could possibly be getting abortions in the space of time he was there.

“They found out that I was there, and I was helping women,” he said. “They were making appointments, just so they could stop me at the public sidewalk and talk with me.”

When women came to speak to him on that sidewalk, he said, they asked him three questions: firstly, “Is it true God loves me,” secondly, “Is it true that God loves me and my baby?” and finally, “If it’s true that God loves me and that God loves my baby, will you help me?”

“And she’s talking about tangible, physical help,” added Walter, who said he would have drained his church “dry” to provide physical support for the women he met outside the clinic.

Even a single pastor who brings the pro-life message to his congregation of 300 can have a massive effect, he said, because of the ripple effect.

‘We don’t have 40 years’

Hoye concluded with a sobering plea for an effort to build a “modern day Underground Railroad,” to help save his community from literal extinction.

“Until we build a modern Underground Railroad, I’m concerned that we’re going to still have the same problems we have now, and what motivates me and my wife is that the numbers against us are huge,” he said. “We don’t have 40 more years. At the rate we’re aborting our children, we don’t have 40 more.”

“If the pro-life movement wants to work it out in 40 more years, that’s great. I don’t have that time,” he said. “That’s my people.”

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/the-pro-life-movement-ignores-the-black-community-at-its-peril-jailed-black

A Life Lost And A Life Saved

A Life Lost And A Life Saved

Outside the womb it’s called a baby; inside, it’s a fetus. Outside, we rush them to the hospital for care; inside, we inoculate them with sterile surgical equipment in the soft spot. Outside, it would be murder; inside, it’s called “termination.” Why the change in terms?

heartandbelly

Let’s call it like it is. If we are for it, we should understand the procedure – the ins and outs, the ups and downs, the good and bad. At just 3 weeks, the heart is beating; the DNA is coded in every cell. The brain is developing, and yet in most cases not even the mother knows of the miracle growing inside. In Texas alone, in 2009, we ended 77,630 of those miracles. That’s 77,630 heartbeats stopped, 155,260 little feet that will never take a step, 155,260 eyes that will never see the light of day, and 776,300 tiny fingers that will never hold their mommies’ hands.

It wasn’t something talked about in my house. The rule was you don’t do this, and “it” will never happen. But the “it” happened to me, and that “it” changed my life forever.

It was cold that December, my first to be away from home. I was making bad choices and defending them with even worse excuses. I became pregnant. I was scared, alone, and so lost; I didn’t know where or whom to turn to.

I started looking for help, and immediately found answers through Planned Parenthood. They said, “Women feel relieved after,” so I made the call and set up the appointment. The women told me, “We have donors who will pay for the procedure if you cannot afford it.” Looking back now, it sounds silly that someone would donate to a procedure as such.

Then I did something I had no real knowledge about, the one thing I thought I’d never do: I had an abortion.

In 2010, I found out about a group called Embrace Grace (EG). Embrace Grace is a nonprofit organization that inspires the church to help young women who are single and pregnant. The leaders instill strength and perseverance through the tough situations. They lift spirits and confidence, too, all by their own testimonies. They give opportunities and display compassion to those who are hurting. Leaders raise money to host baby showers to equip mothers with their babies’ needs, from bottles to cribs to rides to the doctor, and emotional support, too.

I did not find out and attend this group by chance. I was one of the misdirected girls in that group; I was pregnant again. However, this time was different. I had a support system – not just the other girls in the group whom I became friends with, but a whole group of leaders who told me, “You can do this!” They displayed love and compassion and told me my baby was a gift, and – something that still boldly stands out to me – they said I was a gift, too.

While pregnant with my son, I started having flashbacks. The whole procedure would echo in my head, becoming so vivid: the nurse’s cold hands, the loud sound of the vacuum pump, the smell of the clinic, the pain of my child literally being sucked out of me. The depression and pain started setting in. I became paranoid of my son’s safety and would often cry in fear of him being taken away. I would beat myself up daily with the “what ifs,” the “could- have-beens,” and literally exhaust myself replaying my actions. This is the information Planned Parenthood fails to disclose.

Hours after the delivery of my son, I remember holding him in that hospital rocking chair and one of the EG leaders walking in. I became so overwhelmed with emotion; the tears just started rolling down my face onto my son’s. Had the EG leader not intervened when I was only 12 weeks along, I may have not been sitting there holding the one thing I love most in this world, the one thing that gives me strength, that loves me no matter what and is always there for me: my son.

Read More: http://liveactionnews.org/a-life-lost-and-a-life-saved

Aren’t We So Wondrously Made?

Aren’t we so wondrously made?

While explaining to a fellow pro-lifer why I hold such a position, I let her know that perhaps the number-one reason is because I just get so excited about how we are conceived. I’m talking about the miracle of biology here, though the idea that two people can come together so intimately and actually create another person is pretty exciting, too.

Personhood USA's Facebook page has some pretty cool photos!

Personhood USA’s Facebook page has some pretty cool photos!

Science already tells us that life begins at conception. One can find a variety of credible sources telling us this. And, as I have already asked before, if it doesn’t begin at conception, where does life begin? If it’s not from the start, but before we’re born, especially considering all the amazing ways in which the unborn develop, then the answer seems rather arbitrary. Not only is it unscientific to say that life does not begin at conception when it does, but it also seems to be a matter of mere subjective opinion to say life begins at this stage according to one person and at that stage for another.

I would think that we would all know how babies are made, but considering how vehemently in denial of life some abortion advocates can be, perhaps we could do with a reminder. Besides, this is what truly amazes me. When a man and a woman have sex, either nothing happens (speaking from a purely reproductive level) and the egg and lining is shed, causing the woman to menstruate, or something does happen. Now, I’ve already discussed this in a previous article from almost exactly a year ago, so I’ll try not to rehash too much.

While most couples trying to conceive will become pregnant within one or two years, the chances of a woman becoming pregnant during each month are actually pretty low. Some sources say 15-25%; others say up to 30%. And, as the bump points out, the 20-25% figure is for women in their twenties, around the time when they are most fertile, before fertility starts to decline at age 27.

1209018_10151657216328531_214593810_nIt seems almost like a miracle to me then that with such chances, our species is actually able to continue because one sperm is able to make it all the way to fertilize one egg (unless we’re talking about women who conceive twins, triplets, etc). And what’s even more wondrous about that, what truly convinces me of this miracle and of the scientific fact that life begins at conception, is that we are already our own people at the time we are conceived. We already have all of our DNA present, and this genetic makeup, which is of a very real and individual person, has not existed since, nor will it exist again.

And consider if we were to take into account those who still don’t quite get it, but who are almost there and who at least seem to be well-intentioned enough. I’m talking about those who speak of the unborn as a “potential human being.” Even if the unborn child insider her mother’s womb were not yet a human being, isn’t it better to give her the benefit of the doubt, and to err on the side of life? For when those 996976_10151796648498531_1028618474_nwho say otherwise realize the error of their ways, may God have mercy on them when they figure out that they have been advocating for the murder of the innocent.

Read More: http://liveactionnews.org/arent-we-so-wondrously-made

The 50 Million Names Project

The 50 Million Names Project

 

Tonight, an exciting new, pro-life project launches at 50MillionNames.com.

 

 

The 50 Million Names Project is YOUR chance to name and memorialize the more than 55 million children aborted since Roe v. Wade

 

Ohio Right to Life is partnering with the 50 Million Names Project by asking you to offer names for the unborn and to make donations to protect life.

 

Naming a child and donating to Ohio Right to Life are easy and can be done in the following two steps:

  1. Click here to donate to Ohio Right to Life.
  2. Click here to name a baby.

You can indicate in the “Gesture” field on 50MillionNames.com that your gesture is helping Ohio Right to Life to defend life in Ohio.

 

With your generous donations, Ohio Right to Life will continue to work towards the day when we can celebrate the rescue of 50 million lives.

 

Will you provide a child with a name and make a gesture of $50 to Ohio Right to Life today?

 

We look forward to seeing how pro-life Ohio will memorialize the lives taken over the last 41 years–and protect life for the next 41 years.

 

Will you give today?

 

 

Retrieving Stolen Identity And The Abandonment Of The Culture Of Life !

 
December 13, 2013
Dear Friend,

       I received an e-mail from a minister that heads up a coalition of professional clergy and Christian leaders prayer group that I belong to. In his message he referred to Genesis 32:27 when God asked Jacob “What is your name?”   Of course, God knew who Jacob was, but he wanted Jacob to realize just who he was himself, and come to terms with who he was himself as a person, and that he had become someone who was deceiving himself and more when he stole his brother’s birthright. Rather than accept responsibility for his actions, he sided with evil and rationalized things away.

This message got me to think about our society today and the abandonment of the culture of life. It is so sad and incredibly tragic that someone can rationalize away the responsibility of carrying a new life to term, deceiving themselves that their own needs far outweigh that of the innocent life that they helped to create.   It is even sadder and more tragic that there are people who would gladly raise that innocent child as their own, but the mother would rather take the life of her child than let someone else raise it.   I cringe to think about:

 

The lives of the unborn whose parents are told the child may have an abnormality, and don’t think the child is worth being born; and

 

The attitude of people that think the circumstances of conception, such as rape or incest, mean that the innocent child is somehow not deserving of life, yet the violent perpetrator is; and

 

The people who want to prematurely end the lives of the elderly or infirm because they are no longer “productive”, and no longer deserve to live.

 

I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Just how did our identities as human beings get stolen? Just when was the moment in time that our humanity was compromised to rationalize away our responsibility and compassion for life? We’ve allowed our morality to crumble away and our ethics to be put aside to satisfy our own needs….anything to make things easy for us.

If God were to ask us our name today, would we be able to tell Him who we are? Would we say that WE don’t do those things…it is somebody else? And if He said that “whatsoever you do for the least of My brothers, you do unto ME”, would we be able to say that we did all that we could?

I tend to get emotional around the holidays. I lost my 18 year old sister to cancer at Christmas time in 1981, and it is hard not to think about. However, my sister had a chance at life that wasn’t taken away from her by my parents before birth. Even if abortion had been legal when my mom was pregnant, if my parents knew that my sister would die young, they would never have given up the life of my sister even if she had lived only 18 seconds instead of 18 years. That is the way things were, should be now, and should always be. That’s the way God intended it. The miracle of the birth of His Son celebrated on Christmas reminds us of that.

Let’s work together to take back our “stolen” identity as humans from the evil that helped to rationalize it away.   I know we can do it, if we stand united for life.   Our work goes on….

 For Life,

Denise Leipold

Executive Director

 

GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!

    

         Yes, we talk about Planned Parenthood a lot.   It’s hard not to, especially when killing unborn children is responsible for their bottom line.   They just released their annual report this week.  It proves everything we’ve been saying:  In 2012, abortions made up 93.8% of Planned Parenthood’s pregnancy services, while prenatal care and adoption referrals accounted for only 5.6% (19,506) and 0.6% (2,197), respectively. For every adoption referral, Planned Parenthood performed 149 abortions.   Doesn’t sound like much planning for parenthood…..

 

Read the fact sheet about the Planned Parenthood annual report prepared by our friends at the SBA List by CLICKING HERE.

Comparing Abortion to Slavery and the Holocaust

    

Many people have been blasted in the press for daring to compare abortion to slavery and/or the holocaust.  We don’t let this stop us.
Today, we posted an excllent new article on our website that DOES compare the three.  Check it out by clicking here and then scrolling down to the article entitled “Comparing Abortion to Slavery and the Holocaust” written by Dr. Ray Adamek from our board.
 * Graphic above taken from Maine Right to Life bumper sticker.
Right to Life of Northeast Ohio

572 W. Market St.   Suite 2      Akron OH  44303     330-762-2785
 

Big News Of Abortion-Breast Cancer Link In China Provokes Swift (And Unoriginal) Pro-Abortion Backlash

NRL News Today
December 10, 2013   Abortion and Breast Cancer

Big news of abortion-breast cancer link in China provokes swift (and unoriginal) pro-abortion backlash

By Joel Brind, Ph.D

Joel Brind, Ph.D.

Joel Brind, Ph.D.

Just this past week, NRL News readers learned of a bombshell—a systematic review and meta-analysis of abortion-breast cancer studies in China, which reported a 44% overall increase in breast cancer among women who’d had any abortions.

I described it as a “game-changer” for several reasons, including the size of the increase; that it confirmed an analysis of studies conducted back in 1996 by myself and colleagues; that the risk increased the more abortions a woman had; and because it dismantled the most popular pro-abortion defense against the link between abortion and breast cancer (the ABC link).

Like clockwork, the pro-abortion backlash was up online before the week was out. On Friday, Abby Ohlheiser who often writes for Slate.com, posted a hit piece on thewire.com. http://www.thewire.com/national/2013/12/inside-faulty-science-abortion-breast-cancer-link/355850/

Consulting “an epidemiologist” and relying mainly on an earlier Slate.com piece purporting to debunk the ABC link) from slate.com, Ohlheiser trotted out the usual false denial arguments. Those included the “recall bias” argument which asserts that due to social stigma that is attached to having an induced abortion, healthy women are more likely to deny prior abortions in their medical history study questionnaire than are women who’ve developed breast cancer.

Hence, the theory goes, it would erroneously appear that breast cancer is more frequent among women who’ve had an abortion. I have shown in numerous articles written for NRL News Today why that simply is not true. Ohlheiser also maintained that the undeniable increase in breast cancer was “likely due to more sophisticated early detection methods that coincidentally gained traction during the post Roe v. Wade period.”

Clearly, Ohlheiser’s purpose was to reinforce the official “truth” that there is no ABC link. She summarily states: “Virtually no reputable scientific institution endorses the ABC link.” Really?

In response, I submitted the following comment to be posted after Ohlheiser’s article:

“Abortion and breast cancer: The problem isn’t faulty science, rather politicized science and faulty journalism.

First off, Abby Ohlheiser—not a scientist herself—addresses the issue “from a standpoint of scientific consensus.” Consensus—i.e., majority rule—is entirely a political concept. And in fact, significant scientific discoveries almost always go against the scientific consensus (which even scientists call the “prevailing dogma”) of the day.

When the subject has anything to do with abortion—or more specifically, any challenge to the prevailing dogma of “safe abortion”–you can safely bet that the majority of establishment figures in universities, medical societies, voluntary organizations, and government health ministries will side with the “safe abortion” crowd. So to get to the heart of such a politically loaded scientific question, one needs to check out primary sources.

If one really examines the so-called “high quality studies” that do not show the abortion-breast cancer link (ABC link), and also the critiques I and my colleagues have published in the same, peer-reviewed journals over the years (since 1996), one can appreciate the scandalous abuse of science that has permeated the most prestigious journals in recent years. Fortunately, over the last 5 years, lots of new studies documenting the reality of the ABC link have appeared from around the world in international, open-access journals, largely from Asia. It is indeed ironic that many of these studies reporting a significant ABC link have been conducted in countries such as Iran and mainland China, whereas the Western journals have largely presented a great wall of denial.

Fortunately, some facts that undergird the reality of the ABC are quite easily accessible. Just this year, for example, a study in India found that women who’d had any abortions were at a more than 6-fold increased risk of breast cancer (i.e., a 500% risk increase). A study from Bengla Desh reported a more than 20-fold (2,000 %) increased risk.

Just a couple more points need to be made here, by way of correction. Ohlheiser states that “the ABC link idea first got going in the 1980s, in the wake of Roe v. Wade.” In fact, the first major study was a nationwide study in Japan, published in the prestigious Japanese “Journal of Cancer Research,” in 1957—long before Roe v. Wade. That study found about a 3-fold risk increase among women with any abortions, and it certainly had nothing to do with “more sophisticated early detection methods.”

Also, it is a great disservice to belittle the term “epidemic” by setting it off in quotes as if it is not real. Five years ago, a highly prestigious team from the US and China published an NIH-funded study in the Journal of the “National Cancer Institute in which they flatly concluded: “China is on the cusp of a breast cancer epidemic.” Of course, these authors never mentioned the word “abortion,” rather blaming “shifting reproductive trends.” This is really code for China’s “One Child Policy” with abortion (and not as a matter of choice) its centerpiece.

Read More: http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2013/12/big-news-of-abortion-breast-cancer-link-in-china-provokes-swift-and-unoriginal-pro-abortion-backlash

Michigan Becomes 24th to Pass Law Stopping Abortion Funding in Obamacare

Michigan Becomes 24th to Pass Law Stopping Abortion Funding in Obamacare

by Steven Ertelt | Lansing, MI | LifeNews.com | 12/11/13 6:53 PM

It’s official in Michigan. The state legislature has approved legislation pro-life groups and voters called for in a petition campaign to keep tax dollars and insurance premiums from paying for the destruction of innocent human life via abortion as part of health care under Obamacare.

The Michigan Senate and the Michigan House passed the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out. The vote in the Michigan Senate was 27-11 and the vote in the Michigan House was 62-47.

Right to Life of Michigan President Barbara Listing said, “Abortion is not true health care and people who object will not have to contribute their own tax dollars or insurance premiums for elective abortions. This law is instrumental in preserving our long tradition of protecting the conscience rights of Michigan citizens before the Affordable Care Act takes full effect in 2014.”

Listing said, “We are thankful for the hundreds of thousands of dedicated volunteers and prolife citizens who made this law possible. We applaud the Michigan legislators who stood firm in their resolve and voted to ensure no person is forced to fund the deliberate taking of an innocent human life in the name of health care.”

On January 1, 2014 state health exchanges, or the federal or “partnership” versions that will operate in their stead in a narrow majority of states, are required by law to be up and running. Many of the plans under the Obamacare exchange — most plans in some states — will pay for abortions unless states opt out of abortion funding.

Half of states still need to take action to stop abortion funding.

Today’s vote came after the Election Division of the Secretary of State concluded its review of the more than 316,000 signatures and found hundreds of thousands of Michiganders signed valid petitions asking the legislature to vote on the matter.

“Registered voters from every county in Michigan signed petitions to initiate the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act; this legislation will keep tax dollars and health insurance premiums from paying for abortion as part of standard health insurance offered in Michigan,” Right to Life of Michigan said.

“The Michigan Constitution allows the people to initiate legislation through a petition. With the Michigan Board of Canvassers verifying the signatures, the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act will now be in the hands of Michigan representatives and Michigan senators. Because the legislation was initiated by the citizens, it does not need a signature from the governor to become law; only a simple majority vote is required in the Michigan House and Senate,” the group added.

Read Morehttp://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/11/michigan-becomes-24th-to-pass-law-stopping-abortion-funding-in-obamacare

Planned Parenthood Cuts Breast Screenings 34% After Exploiting Komen For Millions

Planned Parenthood Cuts Breast Screenings 34% After Exploiting Komen for Millions

by Kelsey Hazzard | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 12/12/13 10:43 AM

I hate to say I told you so. That’s usually an empty phrase. Let’s face it: most people love to say “I told you so.” But in this case, I really do hate it—because I successfully predicted that something pretty awful would happen.

Back in February of 2012, the Susan G. Komen controversy was at its zenith. You’ll recall that Susan G. Komen announced that it would stop funding Planned Parenthood, which it had been doing to the tune of about $600,000 a year, and use that money for other projects instead. Planned Parenthood responded with an extensive media campaign denouncing Susan G. Komen’s decision. Susan G. Komen eventually caved and reinstated the funding, but not before Planned Parenthood raised over $3 million off of the controversy. Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards publicly stated that the $3 million would allow Planned Parenthood to “expand our breast care work beyond our wildest dreams.”

I predicted that Planned Parenthood would not in fact provide more breast care services in 2012 than it had in past years, despite the windfall. I offered a $100 bet to abortion advocates. Not one person took me up on it.

Breast care at Planned Parenthood has been on the decline for years now. (Note that Planned Parenthood has never offered mammograms, despite some rhetoric to the contrary; what we’re talking about here are manual breast exams and related services.) According to its own annual reports, Planned Parenthood provided 839,312 breast exams in 2009, 747,607 in 2010, and 639,384 in 2011.

But surely an infusion of $3 million cash would reverse this gloomy pattern, or at least allow them to maintain 2011 levels… right?

Planned Parenthood just released its 2012 annual report (it’s always a year behind). Expansion beyond their wildest dreams, my foot. Try 549,804 breast exams. That’s about 90,000 fewer than the past year, and a whopping 34% decline since 2009.

Read More: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/12/planned-parenthood-cuts-breast-screenings-34-after-exploiting-komen-for-millions

Thousands Of Doctors Are Walking Away From Obamacare

Thousands of doctors are walking away from Obamacare

BY TONY PERKINS

  • Wed Dec 11, 2013 13:33 EST

 December 10, 2013 (FRC) – The weather may be chilly, but it’s nothing compared to people’s reactions to ObamaCare. This month, the only thing falling faster than the temperature is the number of the new law’s supporters. Making matters worse, the policy’s biggest defectors seem to be the ones most crucial to it: the medical community.

Thousands of doctors are walking away from the exchange in a large-scale mutiny over the government’s reimbursement rates. In California, where 70% of the 104,000 physicians are refusing to participate in ObamaCare, practices stand to lose millions of dollars under the state’s bargain basement insurance rates. The Washington Examiner‘s Richard Pollack broke it down this way. “In other states, doctors receive between $500 to $700 to perform a tonsillectomy. In California [under the state exchange], they get $160.”

If you’re wondering what’s worse than a dysfunctional website, try a health care exchange without doctors! Or hospitals. With the government trying to drive down coverage costs, insurance companies have no choice but to exclude some of the more expensive facilities from their plans — including some of the top-ranked hospitals and cancer centers. In Ohio, for example, only one policy on the exchange gives patients access to the Cleveland Clinic. Other facilities are opting out for the same reasons doctors are — lower reimbursement rates.

The new revelations put the White House back on familiar ground: the defensive. “The President never said you were going to have unlimited choice of any doctor in the country you want to go to,”said former White House aide Ezekiel Emanuel and one of the architects of ObamaCare. In the latest twist on the President’s infamous promise, Emanuel insisted, “If you want to pay more for an insurance company that covers your doctor, you can do that.”

But after this week’s news on prescription drugs, who knows if patients will be able to afford it? According to health analysts, Americans will only be able to keep their medicine — if they have the money to pay for it. “Health plans are cheapening their drug formularies — just like they cheapened their networks of doctors,” explained policy expert Scott Gottlieb. “That’s how they’re paying for the benefits that President Obama promised — [like] leveling of premiums between older (and typically costlier) beneficiaries, and younger consumers.” For now, if a drug doesn’t appear on these new “formulary lists,” patients could be paying for it entirely out of pocket.

On the bright side, there’s still free birth control, right? Wrong. Congresswoman Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) blew that myth to bits in an interview about the Left’s insulting outreach to women. “When they’re talking about free preventive care for women, I’m having a hard time understanding where the ‘free’ part is,” Ellmers told reporters. “What Democrats fail to mention is now the cost of insurance is… many times quadrupling, in cost, and deductibles are going up by thousands of dollars.” After all, men aren’t the only ones losing their health insurance and watching their premiums skyrocket. “[Democrats’] mindset is that the only issues women care about have to do with their bodies… [as if] the only thing women care about are free contraception and whether or not they have a right to abortion. As Republicans, we know women in this country are concerned with the path that we’re on right now and so many other issues, health being one of them…”

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/thousands-of-doctors-are-walking-away-from-obamacare

No Matter How The Judge Rules, This Is Only Round One ObamaCare Mandate

*** LAWSUIT UPDATE ***

Judge expected to issue his decision this week!

No matter how he rules, this is only ROUND ONE!

December 12, 2013

You and Priests for Life are in a battle of Biblical proportions!

Round One in Priests for Life’s legal fight against the ObamaCare abortion mandate – technically called the HHS mandate – is about to end.  When it does, Round Two will begin in the form of the appeals to the judge’s ruling … either from Priests for Life or from the Obama administration.

That’s why I’m counting on you to CLICK HERE right now and make an emergency contribution to Priests for Life’s Legal Fund so that when Round Two and the appeals begin, Priests for Life will be able to sustain this important lawsuit … all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary!

Make no mistake, no matter what the judge hearing our lawsuit decides, there will be an appeal.

If we win, the Obama administration will likely appeal.

If we lose, we will definitely appeal.

In either case, the Priests for Life Legal Fund must be flush with cash in order to sustain this critically important lawsuit.

And make no mistake, our lawsuit is critically important.  Not just for Priests for Life, but for our nation.

That’s because the Obama Administration is determined to force employers – including non-profit religious organizations like Priests for Life – and insurers to provide coverage for contraceptive “services” that include abortion-causing drugs in all health insurance plans.

This stated goal of the Administration is completely contrary to the goal of the Church and of pro-life organizations like Priests for Life.

In fact, the HHS mandate is nothing less than an act of tyranny because it compels me – as well you and every other American – to violate the demands of conscience.  You and I, along with the entire Priests for Life family and all People of Life, are trying to build a culture in which every life is welcomed and protected.

The government seeks to force us to do exactly the opposite.

Which is why Priests for Life refuses to abide by this mandate.

Our religion, and the integrity of our conscience, require us not only to say we disagree with the government’s goal of expanding access to objectionable practices, but in fact to work against that goal and to avoid doing anything to advance it.

But come January 1, if Priests for Life offers health insurance to our priests, Pastoral Associates and staff,
the government is telling us that that insurance policy must cover “services” that violate our conscience.

In court yesterday, the government told us that our health insurance will cover those practices no matter what we do or don’t do.

But what galled me most is that the government is telling us that the only right we have in this very serious matter is to object to its abortion mandate.  That’s all.

We do not have the freedom to practice our religion as we are called to do.

We do not have the freedom to follow our sincerely held religious beliefs.

We do not have the freedom to live and act according to our properly formed consciences.

We do not have the freedom to offer Priests for Life staff health insurance that complies with our strongly held religious convictions.

But that’s not all.

The government argued in court that all we really need to do is sign a document that “professes” our convictions on paper and in words … but then go against those very convictions in actuality and provide the very types of health insurance coverage that we so strongly object to.

In other words, tell the world what we believe, but then act in direct opposition to our beliefs.

In addition to being hypocritical, the problem with that so-called “solution” is:

We still have to provide the objectionable coverage.

And by making coverage for those immoral practices a necessary part of the insurance plan, the government does in fact require a change in our behavior.

The change is not hard to understand.  It’s the difference between providing health insurance that covers immoral practices and providing health insurance that does not cover immoral practices.

Before the mandate, we were able to do the latter.  Now we can’t.

That’s a pretty big difference in behavior.

Like I said, the government wants to limit our freedom to the right to object.

But freedom of conscience does not mean and is not limited to just the right to object.

True freedom of conscience means the right to refuse to cooperate.  It means the right to say “No” to being part of a project, plan, and goal that we oppose.

And it is that right and that freedom that Priests for Life is fighting to defend!

For ourselves.

For you.

And for all Americans!

So please …

CLICK HERE and make as large a contribution as you can to Priests for Life’s Legal Fund so that,
come Round Two, we can sustain this important lawsuit … all the way to the Supreme Court if that’s what it takes!

This much is clear:

The government under this administration is trampling upon the rights of the Church and the rights of all Americans to practice our religion free from government coercion.

Further, it is trying to tell us what does and does not constitute a burden on our faith.

That is tyranny, pure and simple.

And Priests for Life is fighting against it with everything we’ve got.

This truly is a battle of Biblical proportions.

So please help us.

CLICK HERE and make as large a donation as you can.

And PRAY for the success of our lawsuit; and especially the judge who is considering his decision even as you read this email.

Thank you.  And may God bless you.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

pavonenew.jpg

Fr. Frank Pavone
National Director, Priests for Life