Teenager Chooses Life for Her Baby: “I know that This what I am Supposed to be Doing and I Know He is in My Life Right Now Because He Needs to be and God Wanted Him to be on this Earth”

NRL News Today

Teenager chooses life for her baby: “I know that this what I am supposed to be doing and I know He is in my life right now because he needs to be and God wanted him to be on this earth”

By Dave Andrusko

DarbyreToday at National Right to Life News Today we’re running two posts inspired by wonderful videos. One is the real-life story of a Canadian teenager who chose life. The other, odd as it sounds, is a commercial from Thailand.

LifeCanada does some remarkable work. Today we’re going to talk about “Darby” and her story that you can watch on YouTube.

In less than 3 minutes, Darby tells about the shock of learning, at age 16, that she was pregnant; how she considered her “options”; how she chose life; and how she can’t imagine life without her son.

The video is the model of simplicity. Darby tells her story while holding her son, changing only her (and her baby’s) position and the tone of her voice (hint: she cries).

Darby tells us, she “I really didn’t believe it was real,” and went to the doctor for a confirmation. And, yes, she is pregnant. “That’s when the tears began flooding in.” Her options? Become a parent, abort, or put the baby up for adoption.

In the video Darby explains that the doctor tells her that she has talked with many women (sitting in the same chair Darby was) who “regret their abortions,” but “not once, have I ever met a single mother who has ever regretted having her baby.”

Understandably, so many things are “whirling through my head,” and after a month she asks/tells herself “maybe I’m not meant to have this baby.” After all, they tell you the baby is just a blob of cells, wouldn’t feel any pain, etc.

But then Darby suddenly walks us through the ABCs of fetal development. That by the time a woman knows she is pregnant, the baby has all these marvelous capacities. Somebody explained those realities to her and we can only speculate that they were pivotal.

The remainder of this 2:45 second video is one powerful testimony. As she rocks her baby, Darby says, “I know that is what I am supposed to be doing and I know He is in my life right now because he needs to be and God wanted him to be on this earth.”

As she looks at her son, Darby half-laughingly says, “It’s pretty amazing that you could just love someone so little so much.” Then…tears….followed by a riveting moment:

“I just can’t imagine not having him here with me today…and what I would doing if he wasn’t in my life right now. I think I’d be very lost and wondering, this November, ‘Where was my baby?’”

“Where’s was my baby?” Wow!

Darby ends by reflecting on two central truths: “Life is a beautiful gift,” she says. “I think that we can never take it for granted or put ourselves in a position where we can be controllers of life. Honestly, you know [looking deeply into her baby’s eyes], look at how precious that is. You are just too cute for words.”

Final words of advice?

“Choose life, you’re never going to regret it.”

Tip of the hat to lifenews.com

Rape Victims’ Rights & Their Unborn Baby

 OHIO RIGHT TO LIFE

Yesterday, the Ohio Senate passed a bill that will protect rape victims who become pregnant from attackers who seek parental rights. Ohio Right to Life strongly supported this legislation and worked to ensure its passage.  At ORTL, we have a long tradition of protecting and promoting life regardless of how a child is conceived. We eagerly embrace rare moments such as these in which legislators from both sides recognize the rights of a child conceived by rape.

Unfortunately, a majority of Americans accept abortion in the case of rape, a fact demonstrated by all of the polling.  That does not deter ORTL’s efforts to save those children.  It is our responsibility to change hearts and minds in the best way possible.

We are grateful when legislation like this gives us the opportunity to plant the pro-life seed in the hearts and minds of Ohioans.  We truly believe that these opportunities, above all others, are what make the greatest impact.

Who could imagine—a vocally pro-abortion legislator such as Senator Nina Turner working to protect the rights of pre-born babies conceived by rape! Today’s Columbus Dispatch (below) quoted Sen. Turner, saying, “This ensures that survivors of rape are empowered and their children are protected.”

We are as much surprised by her words as we are gratified by them.

According to the Dispatch, “The issue was highlighted last year when Ariel Castro sought visitation rights to the 6-year-old daughter he fathered with one of the three women he raped and held captive for years in Cleveland. The judge denied the request, but some were disturbed that Castro had the right to file the request.”

We thank both Sen. Nina Turner and pro-life Sen. Tom Patton, a lead sponsor of the bill, for standing shoulder to shoulder for the sake of both mother and child.

 

For Life,

Katie McCann

Katherine McCann

Public Relations Manager

Ohio Right to Life

88 East Broad Street, Suite 620

Columbus, Ohio 43215

614/547-0099, ext. 304

www.ohiolife.org

 

Senate OKs bill to end rapists’ parental rights

By Jim SiegelThe Columbus Dispatch  •  Thursday June 5, 2014 5:37 AM

 

By the end of the year, Ohio may no longer be one of 31 states that offers little legal protection for rape victims who become pregnant from attackers who seek parental rights.

In what supporters called an overdue protection for rape victims in Ohio law, the Senate voted unanimously yesterday for a bill that would allow a victim to terminate the attacker’s parental rights if he is convicted of rape or sexual assault. The termination would occur when a conviction occurs rather than at an additional hearing.

In Ohio, a victim of rape can put the child up for adoption without the attacker’s consent, but Ohio is among the states that allow the attacker to attempt to obtain parental rights over that child.

The issue was highlighted last year when Ariel Castro sought visitation rights to the 6-year-old daughter he fathered with one of the three women he raped and held captive for years in Cleveland. The judge denied the request, but some were disturbed that Castro had the right to file the request.

Rape victims in Ohio who carry their babies to term “face the constant danger that the rapist can seek parental rights over that child,” said Sen. Tom Patton, R-Strongsville, a lead sponsor of the bill.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that about 32,000 pregnancies occur annually from rape or sexual assault.

“This ensures that survivors of rape are empowered and their children are protected,” said Sen. Nina Turner, D-Cleveland, who also pushed the bill.

Senate Bill 207 now goes to the House. The legislature is on break until the fall.

 

Crisis Pregnancy Centers Play a Huge Role in Saving Lives

 Crisis Pregnancy Centers Play a Huge Role in Saving Lives
Right to Life of Northeast Ohio 
June 6, 2014
 Crisis pregnancy centers play a huge role in saving lives
Dear Friend,

        I spent the afternoon yesterday at Akron Pregnancy Services, one of the many vital crisis pregnancy centers (CPC) in northeast Ohio. It was a great way to remind myself that what we do as pro-life advocates is really worth it. So often we hear pro-abortion advocates say that abortion is a reproductive right and that we care nothing about the mother and the child and only want to interfere in someone’s personal lives. If they could spend the day at a CPC they would learn how incredibly wrong they are.

         Most CPCs DO explain abortion procedures and costs to pregnant woman.   However, they go beyond that and really explain the risks, consequences and more. They talk about adoption as the healthy option if a woman is not in a position to raise a child.   They do much more than just convince a woman not to have an abortion. They are not medical facilities, and do not pretend to be, but many offer free pregnancy testing or access to free ultrasounds. They also help woman connect with free or low cost social services such as prenatal care, child care or legal aid. Most of them also provide parenting classes for  both men and women and reward attendance with infant items such as cribs, car seats, clothing and diapers. They provide for emotional support throughout a pregnancy and beyond. Many provide work training programs or refer to facilities or organizations that can do the same. CPCs use specially trained volunteers and want to help women no matter what their circumstance—not only the abortion-minded, but also women who choose adoption or parenting, women whose babies have already been born, and women who are post abortive. Many centers are faith based, but none of them refuse any women on the basis of her religion. CPCs are vital to providing services to pregnant women in crisis to aid them in the birth of their children….which is what pregnancy is supposed to end with, whether you have religious beliefs or not.   They do all of this for free, and receive very little, if any at all, in taxpayer funding.

       Compare that to organizations like Planned Parenthood.   Their website states that CPCs are fake clinics run by people who are anti-abortion. They have a history of giving women wrong, biased information to scare them into not having abortions.”   You can read the rest of the incredible lies and misconceptions they tell about CPC’s on their website by clicking here.   They claim to be an organization that cares deeply about women and children.   If that was the truth, then why is it that:

  • No PP location in Ohio provides prenatal care-what does that say about choice?

  • PP’s own 2012 national annual report shows that abortions make up 92% of their pregnancy services, while adoption is only 0.6%.

  • 45% of their 2012 revenue consisted of taxpayer funding (which cannot be used for abortion), their services are not free in most cases, and their financial model is to increase abortion services at every local affiliate. (Click here for information on PP’s increased abortion mandate.)

        Crisis pregnancy centers play a huge role in saving lives, and they don’t deserve the slander and lies that are being spread by abortion advocates like Planned Parenthood. What they do deserve is our help, more volunteers, and to LESSEN their burden by teaching our children about the miracle of life, self respect and more so that crisis pregnancies can be prevented. Proverbs 22:6 tells us to “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.” We may not be perfect, but we can sure strive for it!

Our work goes on…

For Life,

Denise Leipold

Executive Director

Gallup Poll:  Abortion is morally unacceptable.

recent Gallup Poll demonstrates that Americans find abortion to be the least morally acceptable of major social issues. While well over half of Americans find other social issues to be morally acceptable, abortion remains morally acceptable by just 42% of Americans.

48% of Americans find abortion to be morally unacceptable.

This poll demonstrates that Americans simply don’t lump abortion into the same category of acceptability as they do with the other prominent social issues of the day–even when it comes to other issues of “reproductive health.” Our sense is that this is because many Americans associate the word “abortion” (unlike “birth control”) with the killing of a child, thus bringing it into the realm of moral nonacceptance.

Interestingly, 58% of Americans find having a baby outside of marriage to be morally acceptable. While there is certainly much to be said for the vital importance of the family unit (especially with regards to its role in deterring abortion), we are grateful that Americans find the birth of a child to be more acceptable than the abortion of a child.

On a final note, we are still concerned that embryonic stem cell research is “largely acceptable” and that over half of Americans accept doctor-assisted suicide. The pro-life movement must remain persistent in advancing a culture that rejects practices that harm our human dignity and that oppose the right to life.

Thank you Ohio Right to Life for providing this information

Other Upcoming Events

 

Do you have questions or comments for  

Planned Parenthood?

Now is your chance to present them!

 

The Summit County Progressive Democrats PAC is holding a monthly meeting  

open to the public

 

Tuesday, June 10, 6:30 PM

Akron-Summit Main Library

60 S. High St., Akron

 

Guest speaker is

Stephanie Kight

President and CEO of

Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio 

 

If you don’t want to attend the meeting but want to join is in peaceful protest on the public sidewalks outside of the library, please join us on Tuesday evening! 

 

 

_______________________________________________________

 

  Saturday, July 19, 2014

Sign up now to ride 8, 30, 48, or 75 miles.
Challenge your family and friends to support you and help us serve woman,
save babies, and share Christ.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP OR DONATE

___________________________________________________________

If your organization has a pro-life event that you’d like us to announce in our e-mails or on our website, please call our office at 330-762-2785.

 

 Food for Thought

Too many people are thinking more of security

instead of opportunity.

They seem more afraid of life than death.  

James F. Byrnes 

 

Right to Life of Northeast Ohio

572 W. Market St.   Suite 2      Akron OH  44303     330-762-2785
 
 
Life Education Fund is a 501c3 affiliate with Right to Life of Northeast Ohio.  Contributions to Life Education Fund are tax deductible under IRS rules and regulations.
 
 

Live Action’s Summer Essentials “The Advocate”

LIVE ACTION

A new media movement for life

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Live Action’s Summer Essentials “The Advocate”

Dear Friend,
Summer is here!  Schools are out, college students returning home or heading off to internships, and everyone is looking forward to sunshine and to summer trips.
When making plans for the summer, don’t forget to include Live Action’s campus and community publication, The Advocate.  Toss a few in your pool bag, in with your camping gear, in your picnic basket.  Find places to leave them, or better yet to start conversations.
Don’t underestimate the impact that you can have by

starting a simple conversation.  Many people – myself included – are pro-life because someone reached out to us.  A friend started a casual conversation with me, and it made the difference between my ignoring the issue and my stepping up to defend our pre-born brothers and sisters through prayer, through sidewalk ministry, and eventually here at Live Action.
Make it your summer goal to share the pro-life message to educate your family, friends, and community.  And to motivate others to do the same.  Together we are making a difference, and together we will end the legal slaughter of innocents in our nation.
Our Summer edition of The Advocate covers the central question:
When does personhood begin?

 

One of the most powerful ways to engage others in the discussion about abortion is through questions.  Is what grows in the womb a human life?  Is it a person – not, in fact, an it, but a him or a her?
In the summer edition of The Advocate, not only do we answer these questions, but we also teach you how to defend the personhood of the pre-born with apologetics tools and articles designed to help you start conversations.
This powerful issues is available at NO COST to you.  All you need to do to is order your free copies today.  We’ll send them to your door with suggestions for distributing them in your community.
And remember: the Live Action team is always here for you if you have questions or need support in your local pro-life work.
Yours in the fight for life,
Maggen Elizabeth Stone Youth Outreach Coordinator Live Action

PS: We make a point of shipping and delivering The Advocate completely free of charge.  We don’t want anyone’s financial circumstances to prevent him or her from fighting for the sanctity of human life.  But you can help us defray the unavoidable costs of printing this incredible pro-life resource with a generous donation.  We’re so grateful for your support.

New Poll on US Morality Shows Need for Clearer Preaching: Head of Human Life International

New poll on US morality shows need for clearer preaching: Head of Human Life International

by Kirsten Andersen

  • Tue Jun 03, 2014 13:31 EST

WASHINGTON, D.C., June 3, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Gallup poll released May 30 showing large majorities of Americans now agree that homosexual relations, contraception, divorce, and fornication are “morally acceptable” highlights the need for strong preaching on moral issues, says the president of Human Life International.

“The acceptability of these evils is a direct result of people not being engaged in public debate against those trying to force us to accept these issues,” Father Shenan Boquet told LifeSiteNews. “That’s why it’s so important for faith leaders to speak out and find new ways to help the public understand moral teachings on controversial issues.”

Father Shenan Boquet, president of Human Life International

The Gallup poll reveals that abortion is currently the most divisive issue in America, with 42 percent of people saying it is morally acceptable and 48 percent saying it is morally wrong.  While this would seem to indicate that Americans lean pro-life, the number of people who say abortion is acceptable is actually at a nearly all-time high and has been rising, according to the pollsters.

Euthanasia is a similarly divisive issue, but it, too, now enjoys a record number of supporters – 53 percent of those surveyed say doctor-assisted suicide is morally permissible, compared to just 43 percent who oppose it.

Even support for polygamy is on the rise – the practice now considered morally acceptable by a surprising 14 percent of Americans.

Boquet told LifeSiteNews the poll reflects a growing cultural hostility toward traditional values in America, and indicates the need for clergy who are not afraid to speak clearly on moral issues, regardless of the social consequences.

“When the popular trend in society is to bully people who believe in God and persecute those who try to live out their faith, how can we not expect the morality of the public to suffer?” Boquet asked.

“This poll is an example of how the tyranny of moral relativism can impact our culture. Representatives of government, the mainstream media, academia and the entertainment industry have pushed Americans away from God for decades and towards acceptance of a secular ‘morality’ where individuals decide right and wrong based on how they feel,” he said.

“It’s highly probable that almost all of the people polled in this survey would admit that they belong to one of the major religions of the world,” Boquet added. “All of these faiths hold teachings against most of the issues on Gallup’s list. And yet these people are telling pollsters they’re okay with behavior that is absolutely immoral and sinful according to the teachings of the God they claim to worship.”

Boquet particularly called on Catholic leaders to be brave in their opposition to the secular onslaught, as their Church is one of the last remaining holdouts against the tide of public opinion supporting innovations like same-sex “marriage” and artificial contraception.

“Catholic priests and bishops, who are often the prime targets of public attacks because of the Church’s moral teachings, must be especially vocal and bold in proclaiming and teaching the faith on these issues,” Boquet said. “And they must delve deeper beyond the issues themselves to the root of the problem: the rejection of God’s truth.”

SOURCE:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-poll-on-us-morality-shows-need-for-clearer-preaching-head-of-human-life?

 

Finding Their Voice: Men Speaking Out About Abortion

 

NRL News Today

 June 3, 2014   Abortion

Finding their voice: Men speaking out about Abortion

By Olivia Gans Turner

Editor’s note. Father’s Day is less than two weeks away. Over the next nine days I’ll be running some new, some older stories about one of the most neglected subject areas in the entire abortion debate: a father’s role and responsibility. The following appeared in the January 2008 edition of National Right to Life News.

sadman56reThe phrase that has been used by American Victims of Abortion (AVA) since our early days in the 1980s as an outreach mission of NRLC has been, “We are the mothers, the fathers, the families. They were our children.”

What does this recognize? That every abortion is truly a death in the family and, often, of a family. This grim reality is at the forefront of the message shared by those that told their stories.

But to help people understand that there is a ripple effect from every abortion that extends out beyond the mother and her child has been a rough row to hoe. It was not really until this past November that a professional conference met to address the pain fathers of aborted children feel.

Sponsored by the National Office of Post-Abortion Recovery and Healing, the conference in San Francisco, California, brought together some of the outstanding men and women it has been my privilege to work with since I entered the pro life movement back in 1982 as well as new faces. The synergy between the veterans and the newcomers meant there would be a wider, more free-wheeling discussion.

The presenters were for the most part physicians, therapists, and researchers committed to engaging our culture. We must reach beyond the commonplace but tragically mistaken notion that women have the sole voice in deciding what happens to a child who has a father, two grandfathers, uncles, and, often, siblings.

As highlighted in the June and September editions of NRL News, pro-abortion forces are terrified that men might actually find their voices and then discover that they have a platform in the pro-life movement to share their pain.

Although it was not yet called that at the time, the first person I ever heard speak about Post-Abortion Syndrome (PAS) was Dr. Vincent Rue, at the 1982 National Right to Life Convention. He articulated perfectly what women like me were living though.

He was also daring enough to suggest, even then, that men as well as women were likely candidates for post-abortion emotional problems. It only made sense if one looked at the reality of the life-and-death nature of the decision being made and how men were completely shut out.

Now 35 years later Dr. Rue is still ahead of the curve. He explained that since 1973 only three major studies have ever been conducted to try to determine the effects of abortion on men.

Three-and-one-half decades post-Roe, men are still truly the forgotten players in the story of every abortion.

Rue believes that, tragically, the odds of getting more research are slim. We have yet to do the kind of studies that would address the health and well-being of women who abort, let alone men.

For both women and men, the best we have had to work with so far are clinical and small-scale studies that have only suggested how big the problem may truly be.

Pro-abortion forces are deeply troubled that men are beginning to find a place at the table of PAS concerns. They have long since tried to discredit efforts to discuss the degree of problems women may have after abortion, whether mental or physical.

The discussion about men and abortion threatens many on the pro-abortion side. If we do prove that abortion is not only deadly for our children but also damages mothers and fathers, then, as a society, we must ask ourselves, “Who is abortion good for?”

There were many, many outstanding speakers at the San Francisco conference. Greg Hasek is director of Misty Mountain Ministries and a frequent guest at NRL Conventions. He explored the lack of connectedness many men have to their own father and how this anticipates and aggravates the loss of fatherhood many men feel after an abortion.

Many women have shared with me how the apparent ambivalence shown by their baby’s father at the news of the pregnancy was viewed by them as abandonment. Yet the message given to several generations of young men has been, “Stand back and let her decide!” The results have been a recipe for disaster.

Dr. Catherine Coyle, another presenter, is committed to getting honest conversations started between men and women after an abortion. The best path to healing brings all parties together as they learn to remember their children rather than grieving alone.

Her book “Men and Abortion: A Path to Healing,” is the result of an online research project she initiated. It is an invaluable resource for those looking to expand or provide PAS support to men in their community.

Tom Golden presented wonderful insights into the different ways that men and women grieve. Men need to do something with their pain, so active grief tools need to be developed for them. Memorial project ideas are a good place to help men do something with the hurt.

This was not an Americans-only conference either. The sad facts are that abortion is a worldwide tragedy. Another presenter, Andrzej Winkler, M.A., is a therapist and president of the pro-life society in Poland.

A memory that I have of working in Poland during the 1990s was how often men approached us to talk about their abortion stories. That was something that surprised both of us.

Years of working alongside of good, committed, and compassionate people such as Mrs. Vicki Thorn, the executive director of the National Office of Post-Abortion Healing and Reconciliation, made me conscious of how hard it is to get the layers of complexity that surround abortion even discussed.

For many of the nearly 200 people in attendance, most of whom were male, some of the most powerful moments came when several fathers gave their own testimonies. The sincerity and courage with which they told their stories was the touchstone for the rest of the conference.

As it turned out, there were many other post-abortive fathers in attendance that had come only to find out what the whole thing was about. The fellowship that arose from the honest comments of their peers was heartwarming.

Our children have been forgotten by too many in our culture. Telling our stories whether told by men or by women is an important witness to their brief lives.

Ohio Right to Life Protests Nancy Pelosi in Ohio

Ohio Right to Life Protests Nancy Pelosi in Ohio
 

Nancy Pelosi Speaking at the “When Women Succeed, America Succeeds” event

Today, Ohio Right to Life joined forces with other pro-life groups from around the state to be a voice for life and to protest against outspoken pro-abortion advocates Nancy Pelosi and several of Ohio’s state democratic candidates who spoke at a so-called “women’s event” held at the Ohio Statehouse. This event was strongly promoted by the abortion-giant, Planned Parenthood. 

Endless hypocrisy ran within today’s dialogue from the lineup of pro-abortion speakers. Much was said about “family values” and the nurturing of Ohio’s underprivileged children. Yet, unsurprisingly, nothing was said in defense for the 25,473 aborted babies in Ohio; nor was the heartbreaking racial disparity of abortion in our state addressed. It is grossly hypocritical that some of America’s most recognizable government leaders will advocate strongly for the rights of the underprivileged while at the same time  passionately supporting the limitless killing of Ohio’s children. Where are the same family and child nurturing values in the abortion debate?

Ohio’s new Holocaust Memorial beside event

 

  Right next to where this event took place stands the newly dedicated Holocaust Memorial. This beautiful fixture serves as a somber remembrance as well as a call to value the sanctity of human life. Inscribed on the memorial is the following: “If you save one life, it is as if you saved the world.” Ohio and Ohio’s women will ultimately succeed when human rights and life are valued for all, born and unborn.   

The ORTL staff with pro-life groups, Created Equal and Stand True Outreach Ministries

For Life,

Laura Beth Kirsop
Director of Communicatons
 
  The mission of Ohio Right to Life is to promote and defend the right to life of all innocent human beings, from the time of fertilization until natural death. 

To learn more about Ohio Right to Life please visit our website at www.ohiolife.org.

Researchers Develop Tiny Robotic Hand That Could Treat Unborn Babies’ Problems in the Womb

Researchers Develop Tiny Robotic Hand That Could Treat Unborn Babies’ Problems in the Womb

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 6/2/14 9:50 AM<!––><!––>

International

Most everyone in the pro-life movement is familiar with the photo of Samuel Armas clasping a doctor’s finger. That picture, taken during an in-utero surgery at a hospital at Vanderbilt University, received nationwide attention.

samuelarmas2The photo was so inspiring that members of Congress brought it up during a hearing when a Senate committee hearing exploring the scientific and medical advances of surgery on unborn children.

“Have you seen this picture of you?” then-Senator Sam Brownback asked Samuel.

“They fixed my boo-boo,” he replied.

Samuel had been diagnosed with spina bifida just weeks into the pregnancy. His parents, Julie and Alex Armas, chose to try a relatively new procedure aimed at reducing the effects of spina bifida. The operation was performed just 21 weeks after conception.

Now, researchers are developing a robot hand that could operate on a baby in the womb. Funded by the Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, the work is being carried out by University College London and KU Leuven and it could be used to treat spina bifida and other congenital conditions.

Here is more on this exciting advancement:

The £10 million project aims to create a surgical robot hand which could allow a foetus with a congenital condition to have surgery while still in the womb.

Researchers hope to develop a pincer, with a miniature camera, which could be inserted into the mother’s womb.

They hope it would then be able to insert patches over the gaps in the spine to treat the condition.

The instrument they aim to create will have 3D endoscopic imaging, which will give surgeons accurate detail of the foetus.

Professor Sebastien Ourselin told the Observer: ‘It will be like a plaster. If we can do that, there will massive gain for the foetus while there will be little risk to the mother.

‘We are still in the design stage, so we could end up with a device with four or five arms in the end. Nor would it be used merely to put in patches. It could carry out delicate surgery or deliver stem cells to damaged organs.’

The condition spina bifida is caused during the first month of the embryo’s development.

Symptoms of the condition can include learning difficulties, paralysis of the lower limbs and incontinence.

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

 

Source:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/06/02/researchers-develop-tiny-robotic-hand-that-could-treat-unborn-babies-problems-in-the-womb/

Announcing our June 2014 Priests for Life Membership Campaign!

Announcing our June 2014 Priests for Life Membership Campaign!

June 2, 2014

Dear Friends,

There are some abortions only you can stop, some lives only you can save!

Every time people hear the message of life that our ministry proclaims, and engage in the cutting edge projects that we carry out, lives are saved! On a daily basis, we see it, we hear about it, we rejoice in it.

Now, as I thank you again for being part of the Priests for Life/Gospel of Life Family, I want to give you a chance to help our ministry to save even more lives by recruiting for us more and more members of that family!

We are having a Membership Recruitment Drive for the next seven days. Please go to our Membership Recruitment Form and add the names of as many people as you know who might be interested in learning about our work, hearing from us, and engaging in the pro-life activities we recommend.

Remember, Priests for Life is not just for priests. It is for everyone who wants to do something to end the killing of children by abortion. Our outreach to priests is a key part of our work; but our wider range of ministry – with laws, elections, youth outreach, healing after abortion, and much more – is part of our Gospel of Life umbrella of work.

And our effectiveness increases when we can reach more people.

And the growth of our family is the responsibility of everyone in our family: we all can grow this work together!

And I really need your help for this now more than ever, because

a) Many obstacles over the last few years have kept us from reaching as many people as we ordinarily reach;
b) People move frequently, and often we lose contact with many of them; and
c) The summer is fast approaching, and it is a time when it is harder to reach people.

And this is going to be an eventful summer, with court cases coming out about the protection of life and religious freedom.

We need to reach as many people as possible. Please use our Recruitment Form. Please also keep in mind that if the people you recommend do not want to hear from us, then we will respect their decision. But we know that many people will be happy to hear from us and will be honored to be part of the pro-life movement. And we will help them find where they fit into that movement the best!

So thank you for helping us recruit more members! Let’s see if we can make these next seven days a real boost to our ministry! We will keep you informed of the progress of our effort on the front page of our website, www.priestsforlife.org.

God bless you!

Fr. Frank Pavone

Priests for Life
PO Box 141172
Staten Island, NY 10314
Phone: 888-PFL-3448
718-980-4400
Fax: 718-980-6515
Email: mail@priestsforlife.org
www.PriestsForLife.org
We offer various options for you to receive different emails from the different branches of our ministry. See how you can vary your preferences or unsubscribe. Remember, we want to keep you in the loop!

 

Pro-abortionists Campaign Relentlessly to Eliminate the Right of Conscience

NRL News Today

 May 27, 2014   Abortion, Canada

Pro-abortionists campaign relentlessly to eliminate the right of conscience

By Dave Andrusko

Joyce Arthur, executive director, Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada

I won’t belabor the obvious gigantic inconsistency/hypocrisy: “pro-choicers” who are adamant that no physician have the right to choose not to be involved in abortions.

Nor will I talk (again) about a different phase of the battle over the right of conscience: the refusal to be conscripted by the Obama Administration’s HHS mandate which compels employers to provide health coverage for drugs and procedures to which they have moral or religious objections.

The Supreme Court has heard “Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby” and “Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius” and is expected to deliver a decision next month.

Instead I’ll just talk about “Why We Need to Ban ‘Conscientious Objection’ in Reproductive Health Care” that appears on a pro-abortion website. I know next to nothing about Christian Fiala, but I do know a lot about Joyce Arthur, who is the executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada.

To be honest, I have to hand it to Arthur. Not many are as brutally candor. In her worldview, there is only one point of view on abortion and to recognize another (pro-life) is to give legitimacy to those who deserve none.

For example, last year she blasted media outlets for being too “balanced” in their coverage of the death of abortionist Henry Morgentaler. How so? They’d interviewed pro-life Canadians.

The pro-life perspective “is an extremist view,” not deserving of “legitimacy” and “does not deserve equal time or respect in Canada,” she intoned.

Click here to read the May issue of
National Right to Life News,
the “pro-life newspaper of record.”

Other times she’s vigorously opposed “Motion 408” which called on Parliament to condemn discrimination against females occurring because of sex-selective abortions. No hearings, no legislation, just a condemnation of lethal discrimination based on sex. Way too much for Ms. Arthur.

But, in another sense, this makes perfect sense. Arthur once said, “If the fetuses are recognized in [law], …it could bleed into people’s consciousness and make people change their minds about abortion.”

(In the context of abortion an interesting choice of language—“bleed”—is it not?)

So it only makes sense for Arthur–having defended doing nothing to stop sex-selection abortion, insisting that only her view is given media attention, and warning that too much truth might change people’s mind on abortion–to counsel outlawing conscience.

You can read their piece in its entirety. Let me make just two quick points.

#1. They write, “Reproductive health care is the only field in medicine where freedom of conscience is accepted as an argument to limit a patient‘s right to a legal medical treatment.” I do not know if that is true, but let’s assume it is. How many other fields in medicine does a physician deliberately kill one of his patients (the unborn child) because the other (her mother) wants the other patient out of the way?

To pro-abortionists, who work 24/7 to “normalize” abortion, this is either heresy or poppycock. One patient has to go and it’s the one with the power who gets to decide to “terminate” the other.

By the way, is it any surprise that doctor-assisted suicide—once confined to the “terminally ill”—is now used to dispatch children in Belgium? How long before doctors’ licenses will be on the hook if they refuse to kill born children?

#2. “Unfortunately,” Arthur and Fiala write, “a global consensus seems to have emerged among (pro-choice) medical professionals that clinicians do indeed have a right to deny reproductive health care that they personally disagree with.” What? Bad enough that those crazy pro-lifers (and those who have no opinion about abortion) believe in the right of conscience. But “pro-choice” organizations?! Of course, they devote most of the rest of their article to insisting that such organizations don’t have their heads on straight, don’t see the contradictions, etc., etc., etc.

The “1984-ish” overtones to this kind of argument—remember “thoughtcrimes”?—ought to make anyone (other than the most absolutist pro-abortionist) nervous.

Please join those who are following me on Twitter at twitter.com/daveha. Send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com.