Six Ways Contraceptives Deny Women Control of Their Bodies

 

Six ways contraceptives deny women control of their bodies

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

By Dustin Siggins

The modern world proclaims contraceptives to be the savior of womankind. Abortion groups, President Obama and other politicians, and millions of tax dollars push the idea that without contraceptives, women will not be able to have control of their bodies.

However, scientific evidence abounds that “control” is a relative term — and, in fact, that contraception use may negatively impact the power women have over their bodies. Consider the following:

1. A recent study found that use of some forms of contraception are linked to greater odds of breast cancer. The study found that the use of moderate doses of estrogen in contraceptives increased the odds of breast cancer by “1.6-fold.” The less-popular high-estrogen dose contraceptives increased the odds of breast cancer by “2.7-fold.”

That study is not alone in its findings; likewise, higher risks of cervical cancer have been linked to oral contraceptives. (To be fair, the latter link says that these contraceptives also reduce the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers.)

The World Health Organization also considers the pill a Group 1 carcinogen.

2. The president and his fellow contraception proponents regularly push the idea that more contraception equals a better sex life. However, a study in 2005 found that the pill may very well reduce sex drive and libido. WebMD.com and WomensHealthMag.com likewise report this to be the case, and the latter notes, “some European countries, including Germany, list decreased desire as a side effect on birth-control packages…”

3. A study released in July found that there may be increased risk of gestational diabetes when taking oral contraceptives.

4. While the maker of the intravaginal device NuVaRing says the risk is extremely small, blood clots and VTE are side effects of using NuVaRing. Famously, 2014 Olympic hopeful Megan Henry was forced to miss the Olympics because of the effect NuVaRing had on her lungs. Henry joined thousands of other people in a lawsuit against NuVaRing maker Merck.

5. The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has approved what the Obama administration says are contraceptive drugs and devices. However, Health & Human Services — one of the many agencies the administration oversees — admits that at least one of the devices approved by the FDA ends the life of an unborn child. A further wealth of evidence shows that four of the 20 contraceptives approved by the FDA either are, or may be, abortifacients.

In other words, the word “contraceptive,” which means “to prevent pregnancy,” is being used by government officials, members of the media, and proponents of abortion to fool women into thinking they are merely preventing the fertilization of an egg and sperm.

In fact, many women may be unknowingly killing their already-conceived children.

6. The deaths of dozens of women around the world have been linked to the use of various contraceptives. Those deaths have led to lawsuits against major pharmaceutical companies, including many who Henry joined when she sued Merck.

Honorable Mention: Chemicals from contraceptives, detergents, and farming/industrial activities are causing gender changes in fish in Britain and Spain. While there has yet to be a link to changes in human beings, this is a disturbing find that appears to be spreading.

Long before modern contraceptives and abortifacients came into existence, the Catholic Church promoted Natural Family Planning after marriage and sexual abstinence until marriage. But it hardly requires belief in the Church’s teachings to see that artificial birth control and abortion drugs and devices aren’t the panacea proponents claim that they are.

WANT MORE:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/pulse/six-ways-contraceptives-deny-women-control-of-their-bodies?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=1cfa3175ae-LifeSiteNews_com_Intl_Headlines_06_19_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0caba610ac-1cfa3175ae-397584261

EMILY’s List attacks babies, SBA List

Susan B. Anthony List, Inc.

EMILY’s List attacks babies, SBA List

Have you heard of EMILY’s List? They exist solely to elect pro-abortion candidates who attack the unborn and their mothers by destroying pro-life legislation and aggressively expanding abortion on demand. You could say EMILY’s List is the “opposite” of SBA List.

This election year EMILY’s List has dramatically outnumbered and outspent your SBA List, desperately pouring millions of dollars into campaigning against our strong pro-life candidates.

>> Donate Now! Every dollar helps your SBA List stop EMILY’s List’s extreme pro-abortion candidates and advance pro-life leaders who will protect unborn children and their mothers.

Electing women who advocate abortion – even brutal, late abortion after 5 months of pregnancy when the child can feel pain – is already extreme. But this week EMILY’s List showed just how extreme they are and why we must stop them.

Former communications director for EMILY’s List, Janet Harris, wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post entitled “Stop calling abortion a ‘difficult decision.’” EMILY’s List promptly tweeted the article.

 

You read that right. EMILY’s List, an organization that claims to stand for women, doesn’t think that a woman considering ending the life of her son or daughter is facing a difficult decision. They callously ignore the voices of thousands of women who have experienced the trauma of abortion and now say, “I was abused… I was forced… I didn’t want to have an abortion but felt like I had no other choice.” 

Why does EMILY’s List refuse to, at the very least, compassionately recognize that abortion is difficult for women? Because, Harris explains, “to say that deciding to have an abortion is a ‘hard choice’ implies a debate about whether the fetus should live, thereby endowing it with a status of being.”

And if EMILY’s List admits that a fetus is a human being, they have to admit abortion kills a baby and leaves behind a hurting, grieving mother. They would have to act, electing pro-life leaders and passing pro-life laws that protect women and babies from abortion. In other words, EMILY’s List would have to be Susan B. Anthony List.

Former New York City Mayor Bloomberg just gave EMILY’s List another $2 million to continue their attack on our pro-life candidates across America. Please make a generous donation right now to help your SBA List fight back, elect pro-life leaders to Congress, and pass compassionate legislation that protects women and unborn babies.

Yours in the fight for life,

Marjorie Dannenfelser
President, Susan B. Anthony List

Donations can also be mailed to SBA List, Suite 550, 1707 L St., NW, Washington, DC 20036

Contributions or gifts to Susan B. Anthony List, Inc., a 501(c)(4) organization, are not tax-deductible for Federal income tax purposes. Donations may be used for political purposes such as supporting or opposing candidates. All donations are made to the general treasury of the Susan B. Anthony List, Inc., and are not designated for any particular purpose. Donation will be used in the sole discretion of the Officers and/or Board of Directors in accordance with the mission and purposes of the SBA List.

Send Your Ice Bucket Challenge Donation to Ethical, Successful Adult Stem Cell Research

Send Your Ice Bucket Challenge Donation to Ethical, Successful Adult Stem Cell Research

by Dr. David Prentice | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 8/21/14 5:20 PM

You’ve probably heard of it by now, the Ice Bucket Challenge.  Those challenged are supposed either to dump an ice bucket of cold water over their head, or donate to ALS research.  Most people do both, posting a video of their icy bath.

It’s a stunt, but has successfully raised awareness of ALS as well as donations for research.  But people should consider where their donations go and how the money is used.

ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, a.k.a. “Lou Gehrig’s Disease”) is a fatal, progressive neurological disease.  It attacks the nerves that control voluntary muscles, so it is sometimes termed “motor neuron disease”.  As the nerves die, muscles weaken and atrophy, including the muscles for breathing; most people suffering from ALS die of respiratory failure.  The cause is unknown and at this point there is no cure, and very little that can even slow disease progression.

icebucketchallenge3So, raising awareness about ALS and increasing support for ALS research is a good thing.  But whether you participate in a challenge or just donate to important research, where should your donation go?

So far, most of the attention and millions of dollars in donation have gone to the ALS Association.  However, the ALSA has admitted that it gives some of its money to embryonic stem cell research and has no qualms about doing so in the future.  (Note the ALSA page linked in the above has just recently been changed, and now notes that embryonic stem cell research “has raised ethical concerns.”)

As Rebecca Taylor has pointed out, ALSA also has given money to an affiliate, NEALS, that has given money to a trial that uses stem cells derived from the spinal cord of an aborted fetus.

That trial is being run by the University of Michigan and Emory University, and sponsored by a company called Neuralstem which uses aborted fetus cells for research (“from the donated spinal cord tissue of an 8-week-old aborted fetus.”)  All of the Neuralstem trials use cells derived from abortion.

Project ALS, another charity for ALS research, also funds embryonic stem cell research.

But there are alternatives for donations that use only ethical stem cell sources!

Here are a few of my favorites:

The Midwest Stem Cell Therapy Center (MSCTC) at the University of Kansas Medical Center is only a year old, but is starting an increasing number of clinical trials and educational efforts.

One potential future trial would be using adult stem cells for ALS.  Dr. Rick Barohn, an internationally recognized expert on ALS, recently joined the Advisory Board for the Center.

The MSCTC does not do any embryonic or aborted fetal stem cell research, ONLY ADULT and NON-EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH and CLINICAL TRIALS.

HOW DO I DONATE?  click the “Make a Gift” link in the left column of their web page, it specifies donation for the MSCTC.

(Disclosure:  I am a member of the MSCTC advisory board)

——-

Researchers at the Mayo Clinic are currently doing clinical trials for patients with ALS, using ADULT STEM CELLS.

Dr. Anthony Windebank and his team have one ongoing clinical trial for ALS patients and are ready to initiate a second clinical trial for ALS patients.

HOW DO I DONATE?  there is a “Give Now” link near the top of web page from Dr. Windebank’s link above; people can specify that their donation go to his ALS research team.

NOTE that the second trial is in association with an Israeli company, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, that is developing the adult stem cell treatment for ALS and other neural conditions.  While this is still an experimental trial, the early results using adult stem cells for ALS treatment have been positive.

——-

The John Paul II Medical Research Institute in Iowa City is doing research in several areas including ALS, and does not support embryonic stem cell research.

HOW DO I DONATE?  use the button for “Donate Now” on their main web page

——-

The Adult Stem Cell Technology Center, LLC is a for-profit company developing new methods for growth and application of adult stem cells, and does not support embryonic stem cell research.

Click “Contact Information” in the right column of their web page and e-mail the Director to learn more about the company’s adult stem cell technology development plans.

Donate to ethical adult stem cell research!  Adult stem cells are helping patients now!

WANT MORE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/08/21/send-your-ice-bucket-challenge-donation-to-ethical-successful-adult-stem-cell-research/

The Loss of a Human Life is a Tragedy, not a Gimmick

NRL News Today

The loss of a human life is a tragedy, not a gimmick

unbornbaby25
Americans are known for their generosity. Sometimes they give simply because they’re asked. But if it takes a fun gimmick like an “Ice Bucket Challenge” to get people to give, that’s great, too!

But viral fundraising to kill – literally kill – unborn babies?

How low can we get?

The pro-abortion blog RH Reality Check is irreverently asking supporters to mimic the “Ice Bucket Challenge” by engaging in what they call the “Taco or Beer Challenge.” That calls on readers to enjoy a taco or a beer and then donate money to funds that help pay for others’ abortions.

With all the killings in the world lately, you’d think they’d be sensitive to the optics of asking others to “enjoy” a meal and then donate to the horrific slaughter of a living unborn baby via abortion.

But apparently not.

I’m not the only one shocked by this. Some thoughtful young people started a drive on Twitter to counteract the brutality of this pro-abortion “challenge” by inviting readers to donate to life-saving work instead, specifically to National Right to Life. I was moved by their gesture.

If you’d like to help send a signal to those who would use gimmicks to kill even more innocent unborn babies, please consider a donation today in support of our work. Please click here to make a statement by lending your support.

Because killing an unborn baby is not a gimmick, a fad that’s here today and gone tomorrow. It’s forever.

contributenowHelp us stop it.

Carol Tobias
National Right to Life President

P.S. See National Right to Life’s article on this subject here.

An Unborn Child is Counting on You

 

NRL News Today

 

An Unborn Child is Counting on You

 By Carol Tobias, President, National Right to Life

Editor’s note. This appeared on page 3 of the August edition of National Right to Life News. You can read the issue in its entirety at www.nrlc.org/uploads/NRLNews/NRLNewsAugust2014.pdf.

National Right to Life President Carol Tobias

It’s amazing how fast this summer has gone. As you read this, many schools are already back in session and the often-hectic fall schedule will pick up. Add to that the fact that the general elections are less than 100 days away and some days may really get crazy.

If we want to protect unborn babies and their mothers by making abortion illegal, we need to change the laws; we do that by electing pro-life candidates. And as we come closer to that day of protecting unborn children, the battle is going to be fierce.

Think back to the fight in Texas last summer to see just how far abortionists will go to try to stop pro-life victories. If you think those supporting the abortion industry are rude and militant now, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

For those who have been active in the right-to-life movement, you know it won’t be easy. You know that some of our opponents can be downright mean. They don’t care that an innocent baby is being killed, so why would they care if they hurt someone’s feelings? They march, and they shout, and they lie. Many of them are bullies whose first instinct is to try to win by intimidation.

Pro-lifers, on the other hand, respect life, which, of course, includes the lives of those we disagree with. We’re nice and polite and, on occasion, timid. We take to heart the admonition from Colossians 3, “Clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.”

I know pro-lifers who are so kind and compassionate and gentle that they are afraid to speak up because they don’t want to offend anyone. Certainly, we don’t intentionally offend or hurt anyone. We don’t want to cause arguments or fights and we would not purposefully upset our friends or family or neighbors.

But we have the truth and an obligation to share it. We need to take to heart the encouraging words from Joshua 1, “Be strong and courageous.” We need to have the courage to stand up for those whose lives are being threatened. We need to be a voice for the voiceless.

Much of this will play out during the election season. Voters can expect to hear exaggerated claims, or even outright lies, about a pro-life candidate’s position. Right-to-Life people may be harassed for working for those candidates. There are some who would say they are pro-life but they don’t want you to mix pro-life issues and politics, or what they might call religion and politics.

Protecting unborn children from abortion is the greatest civil rights battle of our time and should impact every aspect of society, including the election of men and women who make the laws under which we live.

I recently heard Burke Balch, NRLC’s Director of Medical Ethics, give a speech in which he reminded us of the famous Thomas Paine quote, “These are the times that try men’s souls: The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

These next few months are not for the summer soldier and sunshine patriot; the faint of heart who want to fight only the easy battles. We need to be strong and courageous so we can elect or re-elect pro-life candidates at every level of government.

I had the privilege of testifying on July 15 before the Senate Judiciary Committee n the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act” (S. 1696). This bill would more properly be called the “Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act.” It would invalidate nearly all state and federal laws that affect abortion in any way. For example, it would nullify limits on abortions after 20 weeks – past the point at which unborn children can experience pain, and laws limiting abortion even after viability, unless they allow each abortionist to abort based on his assertion that an abortion will preserve emotional “health.”

That is just the beginning. Other laws the bill would nullify include protecting individuals or private medical institutions from being forced to participate in abortion; prohibiting the aborting of an unborn child because of the child’s sex; requiring that information on alternatives to, and risks of, abortion be provided to women seeking abortions; and waiting periods after this information is provided so the woman has time to reflect on her decision.

During my oral testimony, I challenged the bill sponsor, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and the Democratic leadership, to bring this bill to the floor for a vote, as well as the NRLC-backed Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (S. 1670), so that we could see where each senator stands on both of these bills.

However, the Democratic leadership is unlikely to allow votes this year on these bills, even on the pro-abortion bill, because they know the bill is so sweeping that such a vote would hurt many pro-abortion candidates in the elections. So it is up to us to make sure that our fellow pro-lifers know where the senators stand on this legislation and on other Life issues, especially those who are on the ballot this fall.

What can you do? Distribute comparison pieces with information about where the candidates stand on Life issues. Senate races, and some competitive U.S. House races will be on the NRL PAC website at www.nrlpac.org. (Many pro-life people will gladly vote for pro-life candidates, but they may not have that information unless we get it to them.) Recruit other pro-lifers to help with your local election activities. If your U.S. Senate and House candidates have not taken positions yet on the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act” (S. 1696/ H.R. 3471), find people in the state or district to publicly challenge each candidate to state a position. Contribute to the National Right to Life Victory Fund so we can mail flyers, make get-out-the-vote phone calls and place media ads.

In this all-important election season, be gentle and kind, but be strong and courageous. A voiceless, innocent unborn child is counting on you.

“The Giver” Opens Today and Why You Should See It

NRL News Today

 

“The Giver” opens today and why you should see it

 By Dave Andrusko

The_Giver_posterreOrdinarily it makes no matter to me whether I see a pre-screening of a movie. I know enough about film to know that the final product can be dramatically different.

But, having said that, I would very much have liked to have seen the prescreening for “The Giver,” Lois Lowry’s remarkably enduring 1993 book that all my kids read in high school and which has now been made into a Hollywood movie that opens today.

In normal circumstances, I would bring my entire family to the local AMC tonight or tomorrow, but the next week is so impossibly busy for my clan that I might not be able to attend for a bit. But I would like to take a few minutes of your time to do two things without spoiling your enjoyment of the film by too many spoilers.

First, with the exception of a dyspeptic review by a grumpy New York Times film critic, the response has been virtually uniformly encouraging, even laudatory. If you’ve read the book, or even skimmed a précis, you know The Giver explores ground rarely trod in Young Adolescent (yes, the term has initial capitals) fiction. Lowry wrote a book for adolescents that provokes conversation (and controversy) in readers of all ages. The film, we’re told, is faithful to the work.

Second, when describing, The Giver, it is almost universally described (in shorthand) as a “dystopian novel for youth.” The overtones are similar but not identical to the therapeutic tyrannies of Huxley’s “Brave New World,” Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451,” Nolan’s and Johnson’s “Logan’s Run,” and (naturally) Orwell’s “1984.”

Of course, control is the controlling motif, all for the “good” of the village. The price of “perfection” is the ostensible obliteration not only of all pain and suffering [seemingly] but of all differences and all the imperfect as well.

Lowry always insists she doesn’t write “message” novels, but it would difficult to miss the horror of what is called “release”–infanticide of infants (there is a scene where a baby is killed—at the “Nurturing Center”– but using camera angles that do not show the actual injection) and euthanasia of the elderly.

Naturally I thought of Europe which is racing head-long into an embrace of wide-open euthanasia where there are no criteria or age-limitations. All done for the betterment of an ever-growing number of “patients.”

But the leaders of the almost-hermetically sealed village of The Giver realize that while knowledge of the past is off-limits, “in order to make wise communal decisions, someone must be the lonely bearer of all the memories,” writes columnist Michael Gerson. “Jonas is chosen [to be the next Receiver of Memory] and discovers that the banishment of pain and difference has also involved the banishment of beauty, art, music and love.”

I don’t want to push this too far, but I honestly believe that as the Culture of Death extends its tentacles, fewer and fewer people will remember a day when we didn’t dispose of the powerless without qualm; when the Bioethical Establishment didn’t joyfully anticipate a time when we can “screen out” all babies with the “wrong” genetic makeup; when it wasn’t an exercise of “autonomy” to kill unborn (and born) babies simply because they are girls rather than boys.

You and I will ensure that our children are all Receivers of Memory. You and I will pass along the truth that we grow not by the lethal avoidance of difficulty but by what Jonas demonstrates in the book’s final scene: the willingness to sacrifice to save a baby sure to be killed.

I hope you go see The Giver as soon as possible. Let me know what you think at daveandrusko@gmail.com.

Do You Know Who Your Neighbors Are?

Right to Life of

Northeast Ohio

 
August 16,  2014

Dear Friend:

I’m pretty sure we all want to live in safe neighborhoods where we don’t have to worry about our children coming in contact with criminals, sexual predators, gangs, drug dealers, or any other dangers. We are ever vigilant in order to protect ourselves and our families.   If you were informed that an undesirable element was in your neighborhood, you wouldn’t be too happy.

I’m sorry to say that we’ve discovered that it’s NOT a beautiful day in the neighborhood in Akron.   We just found out who owns the building at 692 East Market Street where the Akron Women’s Medical Group abortion facility is located, and it’s not pretty. For those of you who follow the news and stay informed about what is happening as we strive to rebuild a culture of life, the name of Martin Haskell will send shivers down your spine. For those of you who are not familiar with him, Martin Haskell is the self proclaimed inventor of partial birth abortion, a procedure that has now been banned in the United States. As if partial birth abortion wasn’t bad enough (if you really want to learn more about this gruesome procedure, CLICK HERE), the list of atrocities against human life accredited to Martin Haskell and his callous disregard for life is unending.

Haskell is notorious for flouting the law by operating with substandard health and safety practices, and he is getting away with it. His abortion clinic near Cincinnati has been operating without a license since it opened in its current location in 2010, and despite repeated efforts to close it down, he keeps getting a “stay of execution” every time an order is issued against him. He has survived several closure orders through lawsuits and more. As recently as yesterday, a judge ordered that his facility must close within 5 days, but he has yet another right to appeal.

I guess I know now why my attempts to contact the “692 Corporation” to try and get them to cancel the lease of the Akron Women’s Medical Group because of THEIR unsafe practices have failed. Finding out that Martin Haskell is the 692 Corporation and the landlord of another abortion practice is devastating, but it won’t make us stop. It will make us ever more vigilant and ever more determined to work harder to battle the atrocity of abortion.

So what DO we do now? We keep educating our children, families, friends and community about the value of human life from conception through natural death. We pray….and pray again. We contribute financially and through volunteer work to groups like us who stay on the front lines to safeguard innocent life. We vote for pro-life legislators—elections are coming up in November, so don’t forget that your vote counts. We pray some more….and we don’t stop.

Martin Haskell won’t stop us….WE will stop him.   Our work goes on.

For Life,

Denise Leipold

Executive Director

Visit our website at

www.RightToLifeofNortheastOhio.com

to stay current on news, legislation, events and more.

 

We need your support!!! 

To make a secure, online donation to help us

continue our life saving efforts, please CLICK HERE.

How do you explain the blood, the pain, the assembly-line death of an unborn baby?

 

NRL News Today

 August 13, 2014   Abortion

How do you explain the blood, the pain, the assembly-line death of an unborn baby?

By Dave Andrusko

Dirtyworkbook2A tip of the hat to lifenews.com for running this powerful story earlier today. The author’s name is listed only as “Hope.”

We have run dozens and dozens of stories about that moment of shock when recognition comes flooding in: “I was a party to an abortion!” Why did Hope’s story so grab your heart?

She was able to take a job as a sign language interpreter at Planned Parenthood, you can surmise from her story, because her faith was not a powerful factor in her life at that time; she could persuade herself that non-judgmentalism was a great virtue; she needed money for college tuition; and she would be interpreting for deaf women who were coming to Planned Parenthood for something other than having an abortion.

Hope, of course, knew better, deep down, and tried to hide from others where she was working. No doubt her conscience was already being awakened from its slumber. It came fully awake in 2012.

I won’t detract from the power of her story by going into great detail. The “medical procedure” she would be signing for she assumed was probably an ultrasound. She writes

“But this was different – we were in an OR [operating room]. The lights were too bright for the size of the room. There were cold-looking metal objects on a table. I was in an abortion.”

Hope interpreted until the actual abortion began.

Click here to read the August issue of
National Right to Life News,
the “pro-life newspaper of record.”

Read her story in its entirety. The descriptions will be very difficult to read. Hope would soon collapse and cry uncontrollably, the reaction, you would think, of any sentient human being whose heart had not turned to stone.

I have seen “the pictures,” I have read about or listened to hundreds of descriptions of an abortion, including Hope’s.

But I wouldn’t pretend to even begin to fathom what it would be like to be in a room where a little life is being snuffed out—and I did nothing, indeed enabled it in some fashion, however small.

Hope quit that afternoon. Almost two years later she still has nightmares. I think it’s fair to say that she is able to deal with the memory because, as she writes, she knows that God has forgiven her and because the baby is now in Heaven.

When I finished reading her story, I had an unexpected thought. How in the world would you sign [interpret] what this 23-year-old woman, who had been deaf from birth, was going through?

The sight of little arms and legs? The blood, the pain, the assembly-line death of her baby? How would you interpret that?

Yesterday I wrote a piece about “Dirty Work,” which is a novel about a female abortionist who had botched an abortion leaving the woman in a coma. NPR interviewed the author, Gabriel Weston, and asked her about the “detailed description of the procedure.”

Weston acknowledged, “It was probably the biggest challenge of the novel.”

So what did she do?

“In the end, I opted for changing the font when I come to describing the abortion procedure, in order … to flag up for the reader that this is the part in the novel that they might not want to read. So I hope that I have given the reader an out if they need one. But I did feel that writing a novel on abortion wouldn’t be complete without tackling, you know, what it actually is like to see that done, or in the case of this character … I’m writing from her point of view, and she is doing the procedure.”

Imagine if Hope had attempted to sign from the baby’s point of view?

WANT MORE:

http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2014/08/how-do-you-explain-the-blood-the-pain-the-assembly-line-death-of-an-unborn-baby/

Manitoba school trustee candidate defends pro-abstinence views after backlash

Featured ImageWinnipeg school trustee candidate Candace Maxymowich Facebook

 


 

,

Manitoba school trustee candidate defends pro-abstinence views after backlash

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

By Pete Baklinski

A candidate for school trustee in Winnipeg has ignited a firestorm on social media after declaring on Twitter her support for abstinence-only sex education.

Candace Maxymowich, 20, a public school board trustee candidate in the Louis Riel school division in Winnipeg, became the center of controversy after tweeting Monday evening a question to voters asking them: “Which candidates will stand up for your parental rights & the moral integrity of children?”

When asked by voters what she meant by her statement, Maxymowich responded the next day in a series of tweets.

“I believe the right of parents to educate their children is fundamental,” she wrote. “I recognize parental responsibility and authority regarding sex education for example.”

“Personally, I do not support sex education other than abstinence,” she added.

Maxymowich was immediately attacked on Twitter for her pro-abstinence stance.

“How do people like that stay so ignorant?” one wrote.

“[S]ome of the ideas she has are ridiculous,” wrote another.

“I’m amazed that in today’s smartphone world, archaic beliefs like that somehow persist. Tragic,” said another.

“This makes me ragey. Kids need to learn,” said yet another.

But Maxymowich’s claim is backed up by numerous studies that show abstinence-based programs yield positive benefits.

A 2012 U.S. study found abstinence education reduced the rate of teens engaging in sex for the first time. A 2010 study among African-American preteens found abstinence-only education decreased rates of promiscuity. A 2005 study examining the lives of over 7,000 men and women found that remaining a virgin until 18 was associated with a number of positive effects, including having better marriage stability, achieving a higher education level, and earning higher incomes.

Manitoba’s Sexual Health curriculum currently recommends abstinence as the “only absolutely safe way to avoid pregnancy or an STI.” The curriculum teaches various methods of contraception at the same time.

Maxymowich was also criticized for tweeting a pro-life statement on Monday about defending and speaking for vulnerable children.

“I’m not sure how I feel that you’re sort-of dragging the abortion debate into a school trustee race,” wrote one person on twitter.

Maxymowich defended her pro-abstinence statements to reporters yesterday, saying voters should know where their candidates stand and if they share their values.

“I personally don’t support sex education other than abstinence — that’s my own personal belief,” she told the Winnipeg Sun. “It’s not something I intend to campaign on and not necessarily something I would push for if elected.”

The election is scheduled for September 10.

WANT MORE:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/manitoba-school-trustee-candidate-defends-pro-abstinence-views-after-backla

 

Fifty Shades of Grey trailer is forcing everyone’s focus on dangerous sex practices

LIVE ACTION

a new media movement for life

Dear Friend,   The release of the Fifty Shades of Grey trailer is forcing everyone’s focus on dangerous sex practices…and Planned Parenthood’s permissive attitude toward them.   We’ve seen powerful reactions to our SexEd campaign from multiple opinion-makers.  Parents, teachers, and young people are simply not comfortable with a billion-dollar abortion corporation telling 15-year-olds to try out bondage and sadomasochism, or to treat their sex partners like a literal toilet.   We’ve seen a flood of coverage of Planned Parenthood’s dangerous sex advice for kids.  You can watch some interviews and clips from Fox and CNN here, here, and here.  Kathryn Jean Lopez wrote a stirring op-ed at National Review Online on Monday.  Another powerful piece came out just yesterday at Acculturated.

S.E. Cupp discussing our SexEd investigation.

State and local officials are also taking notice.  We let you know last week that the attorney general of Colorado is reviewing our shocking investigative video from Denver.  (If you haven’t seen that tape, you need to watch it right now.)   It’s good to see a major news network covering this scandal.  And it’s good to see concerned citizens writing about it, and getting published.  But some of the most powerful change comes when you – working hard in your own community – stand up and act.  We all can take an active role in safeguarding our nation’s children against Planned Parenthood’s agenda – both against those children still in the womb, and against those who make it out alive.   The last time we contacted you, we asked you to send a letter to your local legislators, local papers, and local superintendents.  The response was overwhelming – over a hundred local letters sent in just one day!  If you haven’t tried this yet, it’s really easy to do.   Click here to visit our action center and get started.  We’ve made sure you can add words of your own, and we’re really glad to see people taking advantage of that.  For the people who receive these, your personal statements mean a lot more than just a form letter.   Thank you so much for all you do for the protection of our children, born and pre-born.​
Yours in the fight for life,

Lila Rose President Live Action

P.S. We could never raise awareness of Planned Parenthood’s destructive agenda without support from generous people like you!  Please make a 100% tax-deductible donation to Live Action today, and help us push back against the culture of death.  Even ten dollars goes a long way!