Category Archives: Uncategorized

Finding Their Voice: Men Speaking Out About Abortion

 

NRL News Today

 June 3, 2014   Abortion

Finding their voice: Men speaking out about Abortion

By Olivia Gans Turner

Editor’s note. Father’s Day is less than two weeks away. Over the next nine days I’ll be running some new, some older stories about one of the most neglected subject areas in the entire abortion debate: a father’s role and responsibility. The following appeared in the January 2008 edition of National Right to Life News.

sadman56reThe phrase that has been used by American Victims of Abortion (AVA) since our early days in the 1980s as an outreach mission of NRLC has been, “We are the mothers, the fathers, the families. They were our children.”

What does this recognize? That every abortion is truly a death in the family and, often, of a family. This grim reality is at the forefront of the message shared by those that told their stories.

But to help people understand that there is a ripple effect from every abortion that extends out beyond the mother and her child has been a rough row to hoe. It was not really until this past November that a professional conference met to address the pain fathers of aborted children feel.

Sponsored by the National Office of Post-Abortion Recovery and Healing, the conference in San Francisco, California, brought together some of the outstanding men and women it has been my privilege to work with since I entered the pro life movement back in 1982 as well as new faces. The synergy between the veterans and the newcomers meant there would be a wider, more free-wheeling discussion.

The presenters were for the most part physicians, therapists, and researchers committed to engaging our culture. We must reach beyond the commonplace but tragically mistaken notion that women have the sole voice in deciding what happens to a child who has a father, two grandfathers, uncles, and, often, siblings.

As highlighted in the June and September editions of NRL News, pro-abortion forces are terrified that men might actually find their voices and then discover that they have a platform in the pro-life movement to share their pain.

Although it was not yet called that at the time, the first person I ever heard speak about Post-Abortion Syndrome (PAS) was Dr. Vincent Rue, at the 1982 National Right to Life Convention. He articulated perfectly what women like me were living though.

He was also daring enough to suggest, even then, that men as well as women were likely candidates for post-abortion emotional problems. It only made sense if one looked at the reality of the life-and-death nature of the decision being made and how men were completely shut out.

Now 35 years later Dr. Rue is still ahead of the curve. He explained that since 1973 only three major studies have ever been conducted to try to determine the effects of abortion on men.

Three-and-one-half decades post-Roe, men are still truly the forgotten players in the story of every abortion.

Rue believes that, tragically, the odds of getting more research are slim. We have yet to do the kind of studies that would address the health and well-being of women who abort, let alone men.

For both women and men, the best we have had to work with so far are clinical and small-scale studies that have only suggested how big the problem may truly be.

Pro-abortion forces are deeply troubled that men are beginning to find a place at the table of PAS concerns. They have long since tried to discredit efforts to discuss the degree of problems women may have after abortion, whether mental or physical.

The discussion about men and abortion threatens many on the pro-abortion side. If we do prove that abortion is not only deadly for our children but also damages mothers and fathers, then, as a society, we must ask ourselves, “Who is abortion good for?”

There were many, many outstanding speakers at the San Francisco conference. Greg Hasek is director of Misty Mountain Ministries and a frequent guest at NRL Conventions. He explored the lack of connectedness many men have to their own father and how this anticipates and aggravates the loss of fatherhood many men feel after an abortion.

Many women have shared with me how the apparent ambivalence shown by their baby’s father at the news of the pregnancy was viewed by them as abandonment. Yet the message given to several generations of young men has been, “Stand back and let her decide!” The results have been a recipe for disaster.

Dr. Catherine Coyle, another presenter, is committed to getting honest conversations started between men and women after an abortion. The best path to healing brings all parties together as they learn to remember their children rather than grieving alone.

Her book “Men and Abortion: A Path to Healing,” is the result of an online research project she initiated. It is an invaluable resource for those looking to expand or provide PAS support to men in their community.

Tom Golden presented wonderful insights into the different ways that men and women grieve. Men need to do something with their pain, so active grief tools need to be developed for them. Memorial project ideas are a good place to help men do something with the hurt.

This was not an Americans-only conference either. The sad facts are that abortion is a worldwide tragedy. Another presenter, Andrzej Winkler, M.A., is a therapist and president of the pro-life society in Poland.

A memory that I have of working in Poland during the 1990s was how often men approached us to talk about their abortion stories. That was something that surprised both of us.

Years of working alongside of good, committed, and compassionate people such as Mrs. Vicki Thorn, the executive director of the National Office of Post-Abortion Healing and Reconciliation, made me conscious of how hard it is to get the layers of complexity that surround abortion even discussed.

For many of the nearly 200 people in attendance, most of whom were male, some of the most powerful moments came when several fathers gave their own testimonies. The sincerity and courage with which they told their stories was the touchstone for the rest of the conference.

As it turned out, there were many other post-abortive fathers in attendance that had come only to find out what the whole thing was about. The fellowship that arose from the honest comments of their peers was heartwarming.

Our children have been forgotten by too many in our culture. Telling our stories whether told by men or by women is an important witness to their brief lives.

Ohio Right to Life Protests Nancy Pelosi in Ohio

Ohio Right to Life Protests Nancy Pelosi in Ohio
 

Nancy Pelosi Speaking at the “When Women Succeed, America Succeeds” event

Today, Ohio Right to Life joined forces with other pro-life groups from around the state to be a voice for life and to protest against outspoken pro-abortion advocates Nancy Pelosi and several of Ohio’s state democratic candidates who spoke at a so-called “women’s event” held at the Ohio Statehouse. This event was strongly promoted by the abortion-giant, Planned Parenthood. 

Endless hypocrisy ran within today’s dialogue from the lineup of pro-abortion speakers. Much was said about “family values” and the nurturing of Ohio’s underprivileged children. Yet, unsurprisingly, nothing was said in defense for the 25,473 aborted babies in Ohio; nor was the heartbreaking racial disparity of abortion in our state addressed. It is grossly hypocritical that some of America’s most recognizable government leaders will advocate strongly for the rights of the underprivileged while at the same time  passionately supporting the limitless killing of Ohio’s children. Where are the same family and child nurturing values in the abortion debate?

Ohio’s new Holocaust Memorial beside event

 

  Right next to where this event took place stands the newly dedicated Holocaust Memorial. This beautiful fixture serves as a somber remembrance as well as a call to value the sanctity of human life. Inscribed on the memorial is the following: “If you save one life, it is as if you saved the world.” Ohio and Ohio’s women will ultimately succeed when human rights and life are valued for all, born and unborn.   

The ORTL staff with pro-life groups, Created Equal and Stand True Outreach Ministries

For Life,

Laura Beth Kirsop
Director of Communicatons
 
  The mission of Ohio Right to Life is to promote and defend the right to life of all innocent human beings, from the time of fertilization until natural death. 

To learn more about Ohio Right to Life please visit our website at www.ohiolife.org.

Researchers Develop Tiny Robotic Hand That Could Treat Unborn Babies’ Problems in the Womb

Researchers Develop Tiny Robotic Hand That Could Treat Unborn Babies’ Problems in the Womb

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 6/2/14 9:50 AM<!––><!––>

International

Most everyone in the pro-life movement is familiar with the photo of Samuel Armas clasping a doctor’s finger. That picture, taken during an in-utero surgery at a hospital at Vanderbilt University, received nationwide attention.

samuelarmas2The photo was so inspiring that members of Congress brought it up during a hearing when a Senate committee hearing exploring the scientific and medical advances of surgery on unborn children.

“Have you seen this picture of you?” then-Senator Sam Brownback asked Samuel.

“They fixed my boo-boo,” he replied.

Samuel had been diagnosed with spina bifida just weeks into the pregnancy. His parents, Julie and Alex Armas, chose to try a relatively new procedure aimed at reducing the effects of spina bifida. The operation was performed just 21 weeks after conception.

Now, researchers are developing a robot hand that could operate on a baby in the womb. Funded by the Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, the work is being carried out by University College London and KU Leuven and it could be used to treat spina bifida and other congenital conditions.

Here is more on this exciting advancement:

The £10 million project aims to create a surgical robot hand which could allow a foetus with a congenital condition to have surgery while still in the womb.

Researchers hope to develop a pincer, with a miniature camera, which could be inserted into the mother’s womb.

They hope it would then be able to insert patches over the gaps in the spine to treat the condition.

The instrument they aim to create will have 3D endoscopic imaging, which will give surgeons accurate detail of the foetus.

Professor Sebastien Ourselin told the Observer: ‘It will be like a plaster. If we can do that, there will massive gain for the foetus while there will be little risk to the mother.

‘We are still in the design stage, so we could end up with a device with four or five arms in the end. Nor would it be used merely to put in patches. It could carry out delicate surgery or deliver stem cells to damaged organs.’

The condition spina bifida is caused during the first month of the embryo’s development.

Symptoms of the condition can include learning difficulties, paralysis of the lower limbs and incontinence.

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

 

Source:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/06/02/researchers-develop-tiny-robotic-hand-that-could-treat-unborn-babies-problems-in-the-womb/

Announcing our June 2014 Priests for Life Membership Campaign!

Announcing our June 2014 Priests for Life Membership Campaign!

June 2, 2014

Dear Friends,

There are some abortions only you can stop, some lives only you can save!

Every time people hear the message of life that our ministry proclaims, and engage in the cutting edge projects that we carry out, lives are saved! On a daily basis, we see it, we hear about it, we rejoice in it.

Now, as I thank you again for being part of the Priests for Life/Gospel of Life Family, I want to give you a chance to help our ministry to save even more lives by recruiting for us more and more members of that family!

We are having a Membership Recruitment Drive for the next seven days. Please go to our Membership Recruitment Form and add the names of as many people as you know who might be interested in learning about our work, hearing from us, and engaging in the pro-life activities we recommend.

Remember, Priests for Life is not just for priests. It is for everyone who wants to do something to end the killing of children by abortion. Our outreach to priests is a key part of our work; but our wider range of ministry – with laws, elections, youth outreach, healing after abortion, and much more – is part of our Gospel of Life umbrella of work.

And our effectiveness increases when we can reach more people.

And the growth of our family is the responsibility of everyone in our family: we all can grow this work together!

And I really need your help for this now more than ever, because

a) Many obstacles over the last few years have kept us from reaching as many people as we ordinarily reach;
b) People move frequently, and often we lose contact with many of them; and
c) The summer is fast approaching, and it is a time when it is harder to reach people.

And this is going to be an eventful summer, with court cases coming out about the protection of life and religious freedom.

We need to reach as many people as possible. Please use our Recruitment Form. Please also keep in mind that if the people you recommend do not want to hear from us, then we will respect their decision. But we know that many people will be happy to hear from us and will be honored to be part of the pro-life movement. And we will help them find where they fit into that movement the best!

So thank you for helping us recruit more members! Let’s see if we can make these next seven days a real boost to our ministry! We will keep you informed of the progress of our effort on the front page of our website, www.priestsforlife.org.

God bless you!

Fr. Frank Pavone

Priests for Life
PO Box 141172
Staten Island, NY 10314
Phone: 888-PFL-3448
718-980-4400
Fax: 718-980-6515
Email: mail@priestsforlife.org
www.PriestsForLife.org
We offer various options for you to receive different emails from the different branches of our ministry. See how you can vary your preferences or unsubscribe. Remember, we want to keep you in the loop!

 

Pro-abortionists Campaign Relentlessly to Eliminate the Right of Conscience

NRL News Today

 May 27, 2014   Abortion, Canada

Pro-abortionists campaign relentlessly to eliminate the right of conscience

By Dave Andrusko

Joyce Arthur, executive director, Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada

I won’t belabor the obvious gigantic inconsistency/hypocrisy: “pro-choicers” who are adamant that no physician have the right to choose not to be involved in abortions.

Nor will I talk (again) about a different phase of the battle over the right of conscience: the refusal to be conscripted by the Obama Administration’s HHS mandate which compels employers to provide health coverage for drugs and procedures to which they have moral or religious objections.

The Supreme Court has heard “Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby” and “Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius” and is expected to deliver a decision next month.

Instead I’ll just talk about “Why We Need to Ban ‘Conscientious Objection’ in Reproductive Health Care” that appears on a pro-abortion website. I know next to nothing about Christian Fiala, but I do know a lot about Joyce Arthur, who is the executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada.

To be honest, I have to hand it to Arthur. Not many are as brutally candor. In her worldview, there is only one point of view on abortion and to recognize another (pro-life) is to give legitimacy to those who deserve none.

For example, last year she blasted media outlets for being too “balanced” in their coverage of the death of abortionist Henry Morgentaler. How so? They’d interviewed pro-life Canadians.

The pro-life perspective “is an extremist view,” not deserving of “legitimacy” and “does not deserve equal time or respect in Canada,” she intoned.

Click here to read the May issue of
National Right to Life News,
the “pro-life newspaper of record.”

Other times she’s vigorously opposed “Motion 408” which called on Parliament to condemn discrimination against females occurring because of sex-selective abortions. No hearings, no legislation, just a condemnation of lethal discrimination based on sex. Way too much for Ms. Arthur.

But, in another sense, this makes perfect sense. Arthur once said, “If the fetuses are recognized in [law], …it could bleed into people’s consciousness and make people change their minds about abortion.”

(In the context of abortion an interesting choice of language—“bleed”—is it not?)

So it only makes sense for Arthur–having defended doing nothing to stop sex-selection abortion, insisting that only her view is given media attention, and warning that too much truth might change people’s mind on abortion–to counsel outlawing conscience.

You can read their piece in its entirety. Let me make just two quick points.

#1. They write, “Reproductive health care is the only field in medicine where freedom of conscience is accepted as an argument to limit a patient‘s right to a legal medical treatment.” I do not know if that is true, but let’s assume it is. How many other fields in medicine does a physician deliberately kill one of his patients (the unborn child) because the other (her mother) wants the other patient out of the way?

To pro-abortionists, who work 24/7 to “normalize” abortion, this is either heresy or poppycock. One patient has to go and it’s the one with the power who gets to decide to “terminate” the other.

By the way, is it any surprise that doctor-assisted suicide—once confined to the “terminally ill”—is now used to dispatch children in Belgium? How long before doctors’ licenses will be on the hook if they refuse to kill born children?

#2. “Unfortunately,” Arthur and Fiala write, “a global consensus seems to have emerged among (pro-choice) medical professionals that clinicians do indeed have a right to deny reproductive health care that they personally disagree with.” What? Bad enough that those crazy pro-lifers (and those who have no opinion about abortion) believe in the right of conscience. But “pro-choice” organizations?! Of course, they devote most of the rest of their article to insisting that such organizations don’t have their heads on straight, don’t see the contradictions, etc., etc., etc.

The “1984-ish” overtones to this kind of argument—remember “thoughtcrimes”?—ought to make anyone (other than the most absolutist pro-abortionist) nervous.

Please join those who are following me on Twitter at twitter.com/daveha. Send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com.

Pregnant Rape Survivor: “People Ridicule and Distrust You” for Keeping Baby

Pregnant Rape Survivor: “People Ridicule and Distrust You” for Keeping Baby

by Jill Stanek | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/27/14 1:16 PM

National

Survivors of rape – whether their stories are told around the world or held close – face mixed reactions, ranging from support and empathy to victim-blaming.

When a woman has a child resulting from rape, she may be fortunate enough to have family and friends who help her move forward in life.

analynBut often such women can feel isolated and concerned about how their children will be treated. And they can confront strong reactions, such as people telling them the child is the “spawn of an evil act” and should have been aborted or adopted, which happened to Analyn Megison [pictured right], a mother in Florida who was raped and had a daughter as a result. (Her daughter is now 9 years old.)

A study in 2000 estimated that 25,000 rapes result in pregnancy in the United States each year, and other studies have found that at least 32 percent of the women keep and raise the child, according to a Georgetown Law Journal article by Chicago lawyer Shauna Prewitt….

… [I]t’s important that society not stereotype rape survivors and end up ostracizing women who choose to keep their children.

“People ridicule you and distrust you because you chose to have your child – ‘Oh, you must not have been raped,’” Megison says. “It’s such a strange world we live in where you have to be questioned as a mother why you love the child that… you nurse and play with and pray with and read stories with.”

~ Stacy Teicher Khadaroo, The Christian Science Monitor, May 23

CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

LifeNews.com Note: Jill Stanek fought to stop “live birth abortions” after witnessing one as an RN at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois. That led to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act legislation, signed by President Bush, that would ensure that proper medical care be given to unborn children who survive botched abortion attempts.

SOURCE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/05/27/pregnant-rape-survivor-people-ridicule-and-distrust-you-for-keeping-baby/

BREAKING: Planned Parenthood Exposed!

Dear Friend,   Did you know that Planned Parenthood commits hundreds of thousands of abortions – destroys hundreds of thousands of human beings – every year?  Did you know that your tax money funds this abortion giant – whether you like it or not?   Well, we have good news.  Live Action is launching a national campaign to show the American people what this corrupt organization is doing with their money…and to give our leaders the knowledge they need to do their jobs, and protect us from being forced to fund a huge child-killing corporation.   Please visit PlannedParenthoodExposed.com and see just how deep this evil runs.  See what your tax money is funding.  And sign the petition to put a stop to abortion conscription.   We’ve spent years documenting the lies, the corruption, and the abuse running rampant in America’s abortion industry.  Planned Parenthood, the leader of that industry, got $500 million from “the government” – meaning you and me – in 2012.   To force Americans to fund the destruction of human beings – to fund an organization that aids sex-traffickers, promotes racism, and covers up the sexual abuse of children – is an abomination.   That’s why we’re taking action.  And we want you to join us.   Please visit our new site, PlannedParenthoodExposed.com, and sign our petition.  We’ve exposed this abortion corporation as one of the greatest purveyors in the world of the culture of death.   So now that you know, what will you do?

Yours in the fight for life,

Lila Rose President Live Action

PS: We have big plans for this campaign – plans that include shutting down the abortion giant’s hundred-million-dollar revenue stream for good.  You can help us make this victory happen by sending a 100% tax-deductible donation to Live Action, and signing the petition today.  Please join us!

He’s Giving Millions for Abortion.

LIVE ACTION

a new media movement for life

Dear Friend,
Have you heard about Big Abortion’s huge ally?  He flies under the radar – he’s no George Soros or Ilyse Hogue – but the pile of money he sends the abortion industry equals the entirety of Planned Parenthood’s $1.2-billion annual budget.   You might not associate abortion with Warren Buffett, but the two are intimately linked.  Almost $300 million to Planned Parenthood.  Over $211 million to Marie Stopes.  As our president Lila Rose commented recently, Buffett’s contributions to child destruction are like “money invested for genocide by warlords.”   At Live Action, we are fighting well-heeled abortion-bankers like Buffet with everything we have – and with a fraction of their budget.  You don’t need to be a billionaire to help us!  Can you send a quick $50 donation to Live Action today?

Sending millions of dollars to Big Abortion.

We don’t have Warren Buffett’s billions bankrolling our life-saving efforts.  But we do have the truth about human dignity.  We have groundbreaking investigations that expose the abortion industry’s lies, their lawbreaking, and their bloody operations.  Our reporting and education initiatives show the American people exactly what Buffett’s millions buy.   And moreover, we have the dedication and fortitude of a pro-life movement, powered by you, determined to save every child from the culture of death.  Can we count on you for a $50 donation to put the finishing touches on our latest investigation?   You can make a difference without writing a billion-dollar check.  Every dollar you give fights a dollar Buffet has given to fund abortion. Your $50 donation will make a difference.  If your generosity saves the life of even one precious child, that’s a huge difference for that child!
Yours in the fight for life,
Drew Belsky Communications Director Live Action

PS: Not even a billion dollars from Warren Buffett will protect Big Abortion’s image from what we’re about to show the world.  We are preparing our latest explosive investigation for release RIGHT NOW…but we need your help to finish it.  Please send us a 100% tax-deductible donation today!

Why Abortion Clinic Regulation Drives Pro-Abortionists Crazy

NRL News Today

Why abortion clinic regulation drives pro-abortionists crazy

By Dave Andrusko

 Pro-abortion Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) is working full time to undercut protective abortion clinic regulation

It would be almost amusing if the subject—abortion—was not so horribly tragic and the attempt to conjure up conspiracies so transparent. In a few words, pro-abortionists are forever accusing pro-lifers of “secret” (or “back-door”) plans for this and that which (pro-abortionists hope) will fizzle if only the public finds out.

Of course the problem (for them) is that our objectives—our “plans”—are transparent. Borrowing from President George W. Bush we work unceasingly for “the day when every child is welcomed in life and protected in law.”

That glorious day has yet to be realized. As we work toward a restoration of protection (and a “culture of life”), we move one step at a time. We offer commonsensical protections which, unsurprisingly, the majority of Americans agree with.

But, unlike our opponents, we are win-win types—we care about both mother and unborn child. We will do everything possible to persuade a woman to choose life. Every single success matters.

We work as well to ensure there are no more Kermit-Gosnell-type abortion clinics. And for all those apologists who insist he was a “renegade” or “outlier,” there are plenty of clinics that perform “meat-market style assembly line” abortions (to quote one nurse who formerly worked at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Delaware).

That is why we promote laws to require that abortionists who (in many states) fly in, kill unborn babies, and fly out, have admitting privileges in a local hospital if/when complications arise. Similarly for requiring that the abortionist be in the pregnant woman’s presence when she receives abortifacients, rather than hundreds of miles away communicating by webcam/skype.

Click here to read the May issue of
National Right to Life News,
the “pro-life newspaper of record.”

What prompted this post was an article written by Robin Marty, a prolific pro-abortion writer who occasionally stumbles across an insight. This particular piece, which appeared at www. truth-out.org, is not an example of such.

However there is an interesting paranoid twist on something Marty [mis]represents: the aforementioned abortion clinic regulation. Like all defenders of the Abortion Industry, Marty can only see any protective regulation through the lens of “TRAP,” the pro-abortionist’s acronym for what she/he thinks is a clever turn of phrase–Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider.

So, by definition if upgrading minimal requirements leads an abortion clinic to close (or merge), this must be an example of TRAP in action. And of course if you assume that abortion clinics are model “health care providers,” places where it is nearly impossible for an abuse to occur, then—by definition—no upgrades are needed.

But, of course, this is not true. The irony of this was on display Monday in the first day of a lawsuit against Alabama’s admitting privileges requirement, HB 57.

One abortion clinic owner was complaining that “If I close my doors, their [women’s] access is dramatically, dramatically reduced.” We pointed out that one set of doors had already closed, and not because of HB 57.

“The Birmingham clinic of Planned Parenthood Southeast ceased operations in January after firing two staff members for selling an abortion medication to a person in the clinic’s parking lot,” AP’s Phillip Rawls reported. “Staci Fox said the clinic hopes to get approval from the state health department to reopen by next month.”

Our only “target” is to protect women from unscrupulous abortionists.

But Marty’s piece is about how, if abortion clinics close, “private physicians may be fielding more requests to terminate a patient’s pregnancy.” She doesn’t say it, but I’m guessing that she believes that is the one and only redeeming factor. By that I mean pro-abortionists lament that almost all abortions are done in free-standing abortion clinics. The result is, as Marty puts it, that abortion has become “segregated from the rest of health care, resulting in its stigmatization.” But if women in larger numbers come to and are accepted by, say, doctor’s offices….

However the ‘evil genius’ of a Louisiana bill about to be signed into law by Gov. Bobby Jindal is that abortionists who perform only a “few” (aka 60 or fewer) abortions will no longer get a free pass.

As one physician who testified on behalf of the bill said, abortion facilities shouldn’t have “special interest loopholes” that sanction a lower standard of care than what ambulatory surgical centers must have.

So the bill mandates that surgical abortion facilities are held to the same safety standards of other outpatient surgical facilities. What drives Marty crazy is a change in the status quo.

Currently in Louisiana an abortionist can perform 60 abortions a year before being subject to the health and safety inspections that are required of “licensed outpatient abortion facilities.” But because every woman is entitled to the protection of regulated safety standards, the new bill requires licensure and inspections for physicians who perform five or more abortions per year.

Marty laments that this is all unnecessary and a huge inconvenience to the (so to speak) mom and pop abortionist. But of course if patient safety is a concern, you look at the requirement differently.

Marty seeks to assist abortionists polish their image by being reintegrated into real medical care. We are not. Abortion is not health care. It’s death care, whether in free-standing abortion clinics or doctors’ offices.

Bravo to Louisiana and all the other states that have, are, or will insist that abortionists and abortion clinics be regulated.

Kermit Gosnell not Unique, Reporter says in Sequel to “3801 Lancaster”

 

NRL News Today

 May 22, 2014   Gosnell

Kermit Gosnell not unique, reporter says in sequel to “3801 Lancaster”

<!– pat dup image remove attempt 3801Lancasterpart2 End of remove dup image attempt –>

By Dave Andrusko

3801Lancasterpart2“I have no doubt that there are people out there doing late term abortions and probably doing what he [Kermit Gosnell] was doing. The issue is whether someone will say something and they’ll be caught at some point.”

This deeply unsettling quote comes from Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Joseph A. Slobodzian. You’ll find his remarks in the trailer for the forthcoming “3801 LANCASTER: America Tragedy,” a 45-minute-long documentary sequel to “3801 Lancaster.” Slobodzian did the best reporting on the Gosnell trial which culminated in Gosnell sentenced to three consecutive life sentences.

NRL News Today wrote extensively about Part One, which was an eye-opener even for people like me who’d read the 260+page Philadelphia Grand Jury report on Gosnell more than once. (More about that below.)

According to press reports, 3801 LANCASTER: America Tragedy was screened this week at The PFS [Philadelphia Film Society] Theater at the Roxy. The subtitle for the new documentary gives you a heads-up what director David Altrogge and producer Jen Thompson are offering the public—“Kermit Gosnell: His Victims and the State that failed to act.”

On their blog, we read

“When we set out to make the film, we originally thought it was just going to be a sequel. However, the film has grown into so much more than a mere ‘Part II.’ In so many ways, it’s the culmination of what we began over three years ago. While the first installment was an overview of the case, ‘3801 Lancaster: American Tragedy’ goes so much deeper, answering many of the questions that were left unanswered when we released the first installment last January.”

Part One took a first look at of how in the world something like Gosnell’s “House of Horrors” could possibly have continued in operation, after one woman died and then another. And that, of course, doesn’t even address the hundreds of violations of various codes and laws and the most ghastly reality of all: Gosnell intentionally aborted children in a manner that they would be born alive and then he would murder them.

3801 LANCASTER: America Tragedy goes into more depth about the incredible failure to reign him in, talks to women whom Gosnell and his unlicensed staff aborted, and jurors who served on the six-week-long trial.

Click here to read the May issue of
National Right to Life News,
the “pro-life newspaper of record.”

We wrote about Part One at nrlc.cc/1ktb0AUnrlc.cc/126z8lU,  and nrlc.cc/XaAAhs, to cite just three posts. I initially wrote

“The first shot is of Katie Couric, not exactly one of us, shown seated at the anchor’s desk. She cautions her audience, ‘Now this next story comes with a strong word of caution. The details are gruesome. You won’t want young children to watch.’

“And that illustrates the genius of the documentary. There are sections where pro-lifers are shown denouncing Gosnell. However, except for this and the stories told by two women who Gosnell aborted, the bulk of the video is comprised of clips like this, the on-camera testimony of Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams and Assistant District Attorney Ann Ponterio before a state Senate committee, an interview with a Philadelphia Inquirer reporter, and quotes from the Grand Jury report which led directly to the indictment of Gosnell, his wife, and many ill-trained members of his staff.”

I’d like to add something I’ve alluded to many times but have not nailed down in a long while. Gosnell was convicted in the murders of “only” three viable babies. But his killing spree was immense.

The Grand Jury, reviewing just the fraction of Gosnell’s abortion files seized by authorities, “was still able to document numerous instances in which ultrasound readings were manipulated to disguise illegal late-term abortions. Our review, although limited by the disappearance of many patient files, revealed that Gosnell reported performing abortions on 24.5-week fetuses more than 80 times between 2007 and February 2010.”

Get that? The Grand Jury only saw a sample of Gosnell’s files, many of which had evidence that ultrasound readings had been manipulated to “disguise illegal late-term abortions.” In other words, by the Grand Jury’s own accounting, were there accurate records, it is highly likely Gosnell would be charged with many more counts of murder!

We will keep you updated on 3801 LANCASTER: America Tragedy.

Please join those who are following me on Twitter at twitter.com/daveha. Send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com.