Monthly Archives: February 2014

Out of Touch on Abortion

Yesterday, the Akron Beacon Journal ran my response to their editorial, “Overreach on abortion.” We were both surprised and gratified that the newspaper gave us so much space to respond. Please find my op-ed by using this link (http://www.ohio.com/editorial/katie-mccann-out-of-touch-on-abortion-1.467494), or by reading below.

 

I hope that you find the points made in this response useful, and I encourage you to use them to expose the extremism of pro-choice politicians and their position.

 

Warm regards,

 

Katie McCann

Public Relations Manager

 

 

Ohio.com
Katie McCann: Out of touch on abortion

By Katie McCann

Published: February 18, 2014 – 07:05 PM

Your Feb. 11 editorial “Overreach on abortion” gave me pause to reflect on how out of touch some arguments have become in the abortion debate.

Rightly, you suggest discomfort with risking a woman’s health by implementing legislation that restricts abortions. But our concern is that abortion facilities across the state are already risking women’s health by failing to adhere to basic health and safety standards.

Unfortunately, some pro-choicers seem to have moved so far to the extreme that they won’t even hold abortion clinics accountable for protecting the very thing they claim to stand for: women’s health.

Regrettably, this extremism is creeping further and further into our lives, to the point of infringing on the basic rights of American taxpayers. While Roe v. Wade might have deemed abortion a “right,” it did not give the state the authority to invalidate all other rights, including our First Amendment rights.

But pro-choicers seem to think that it did – that Americans who have deep moral convictions against abortion must fund Planned Parenthood, America’s abortion industry giant. To impose such a requirement is to breach a fundamental right of every American citizen, all in the name of abortion.

Frighteningly, this pro-choice extremism seems so blinded to the faults of the abortion industry that it even overlooks its racial injustice. Consider this as Ed FitzGerald, county executive of Cuyahoga County, makes his bid for governor, leading with abortion as his issue: About 63 percent of abortions on Cuyahoga County residents took place on black women, even though they make up about 15 percent of the county’s population.

My guess is that if these babies were dying from anything other than abortion, FitzGerald would object to the inhumanity and racial injustice. Instead, he railed against our common-sense pro-life initiatives and selected a pro-choice running mate who formerly served on the board of Planned Parenthood.

The FitzGerald team and other pro-choice extremists have proved themselves out of touch with Ohioans. Opposition to Ohio’s late-term abortion ban sets pro-choicers back several decades.

Last summer, a Quinnipiac poll revealed that a resounding 60 percent of women prefer a 20-week abortion ban to the Supreme Court-prescribed 24-week ban. Such a ban would protect 5-month, pre-born, pain-capable babies from the hurt of abortion.

To oppose a ban on so ruthless a procedure – a procedure that Americans overwhelmingly oppose in the late months of pregnancy – is to demonstrate the radicalism of fringe abortion proponents.

While your editorial suggested extremism behind Ohio’s new pro-life laws, I would simply ask that you consider the extremism behind the radical pro-choice position – an extremism that breaches fundamental rights, turns a blind eye on racial injustice and supports taking the life of a child through the ninth month of pregnancy.

McCann is the public relations manager for Ohio Right to Life, based in Columbus.
Find this article at: 
http://www.ohio.com/editorial/katie-mccann-out-of-touch-on-abortion-1.467494
 Click to Print

Copyright © 2013 Ohio.com

Ohio Right to Life Logo

To learn more about Ohio Right to Life please visit our website at www.ohiolife.org.

Planned Parenthood Takes the Lead in Obamacare’s Enrollment Army

Planned Parenthood Takes the Lead in Obamacare’s Enrollment Army

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 2/19/14 1:21 PM

When Congress passed Obamacare, it did so over the objections of the pro-life community, which pointed out the ways in which it would fund abortions and send taxpayer dollars to the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

As the Obama administration struggles to sign up people for Obamacare, which is already rationing care as patients are denied or delayed treatment and hospitals and doctors offices closes, Planned Parenthood is taking the lead to assist the administration in signing up more Americans for the boondoggle.

plannedparenthood76The working relationship with the Obama administration will make it easy for America’s largest abortion business to sign up more customers for abortions and to plug them into their political system pushing and promoting pro-abortion candidates like President Obama. This is all funded with taxpayer dollars.

As the New York Times reports:

The campaign is staffed by organizations deploying thousands of paid and volunteer canvassers across the country. Planned Parenthood, one of the most aggressive groups, has raised millions of dollars for the effort. It is paying about 400 workers like Ms. Morwin $12 an hour. They are knocking on an average of 18,000 doors a day in eight states: Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas.

Enroll America, a nonprofit group that is trying to expand the health care rolls, has hired 266 people and recruited 14,000 volunteers to not only canvass neighborhoods but also make calls at phone banks and host events at community colleges in 11 states. The group has also spent $7 million to advertise on the Internet.

The efforts are important for Mr. Obama, who has been damaged politically by the initial failures of his health care website. Now, with HealthCare.gov finally working, his administration and outside supporters are racing to meet their goal of signing up seven million people by March 31. By the end of January, nearly 3.3 million people had enrolled. To the canvassers, at least, the original goal seems a long way off.

“Can’t sweat the small stuff, not in this biz,” Ms. Morwin said, after retreating from a run-down rental property on a modest street lined with palm trees in Hollywood, where she was once again informed that the person on her list no longer lived there. “You see the challenges I have?”

The canvassers’ lists are derived from data created at Enroll America’s offices in Washington by some of the same computer programmers who churned out the statistical models for Mr. Obama’s presidential campaigns. Using commercially available information, the data experts generate lists of people with rankings that indicate their likelihood of needing health insurance. The typical uninsured is younger, male and either low-income or unemployed.

People are scored from zero to 100, with those at the top most likely to be uninsured. By using an uninsured score of just 20 or higher, Planned Parenthood is casting a wider net to improve the chance that its door-knockers find people without insurance. In Broward County, home to 1.39 million people, the Enroll America data lists 284,000 such targets between the ages of 18 and 45.

In Florida, Planned Parenthood has turned the data into “heat maps” of the uninsured, with neighborhoods colored in varying intensities of red to indicate where most of the targets live.

After more than an hour canvassing Hollywood for Planned Parenthood, Alberonick Valsaint, 42, had yet to sign up anyone for health insurance.

LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/02/19/planned-parenthood-takes-the-lead-in-obamacares-enrollment-army/

After 41 Years of Abortion, Here’s 41 Reasons I’m Pro-Life

After 41 Years of Abortion, Here’s 41 Reasons I’m Pro-Life

by Maria Vitale Gallagher | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 2/19/14 10:51 AM

In commemoration of the 41st anniversary of the tragic U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade and its companion decision, Doe v. Bolton, here are the 41 reasons I am pro-life:

  1. Every child, no matter what race, religion, or the circumstances of conception, has an inherent right to live.
  2. Motherhood is a beautiful gift which should be celebrated, not eliminated.
  3. prolifeimage48Abortion is an egregious attack on the family.
  4. A true feminist supports other women, including those in the womb.
  5. Abortion is not an anti-poverty plan but simply a means to eliminate the poor.
  6. As the big sister of a preemie, I learned the value of the littlest lives.
  7. It is a supreme injustice to destroy an entire class of people—those with special needs—by means of abortion.
  8. The pro-life movement sees women as strong and capable.
  9. It is heartbreaking to see a father cry over the loss of his unborn child.
  10. There is no supermodel more beautiful than a woman cradling a second life within her.
  11. The March for Life is the most inspiring event I have ever witnessed.
  12. I have seen women who have had an abortion experience profound healing and new hope after joining the pro-life movement.
  13. The people, the people, the people!
  14. No sound is as sweet as a mother singing a lullaby to her newborn.
  15. A friend introduced me to the landmark book Grand Illusions by George Grant and my eyes opened to the immense tragedy that abortion represents.
  16. My Church has been pro-life since its inception.
  17. The friends and family members who were adopted who have so enriched my life.
  18. Norma McCorvey, the late Bernard Nathanson, and Abby Johnson, who once accepted and promoted abortion but who later chose to embrace life.
  19. Lila Rose, who has brought the head of a journalist and the heart of a civil rights pioneer to the pro-life movement.
  20. The many women and men who work tirelessly in local pro-life groups, volunteering through bitter cold and blazing sun to bring the pro-life message to their communities.
  21. The only logical beginning to life is conception and the only logical end is natural death.
  22. The pro-life movement is on the right side of history.
  23. The miracle of ultrasound, which introduced me to the miracle that lies within a mother’s womb.
  24. Dr. Alveda King and her bold proclamation that the pro-life movement is the civil rights movement of our time.
  25. The hope that is as natural to pro-lifers as breathing.
  26. My childhood idol, suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who was pro-life.
  27. Pregnancy help centers, which extend a hand of friendship to women in often incredibly difficult circumstances.
  28. An unborn child should not be forced to suffer for the mistakes her parents may have made.
  29. The high school and college students, who bring energy and enthusiasm to the pro-life movement.
  30. Abortion does not solve problems for women—it only creates additional ones.
  31. No baby should be blocked access to birth.
  32. Actor Eduardo Verastegui, who has become a pro-life ambassador to Hollywood.
  33. “L’Chaim” (“To Life”) is a wonderful phrase to live by.
  34.  The late Congressman Henry Hyde, who fearlessly fought for the right of taxpayers not to fund the abortion industry.
  35. Without the right to life, none of the other rights we hold as Americans could be exercised.
  36. The people who are determined not to allow their disabilities to become death sentences.
  37. My training as a journalist taught me to search for truth, and to be pro-life is to recognize the truth that abortion ends an innocent human life and can cause immeasurable pain for a mother.
  38. Being pro-life brings indescribable joy and peace of mind.
  39. In the pro-life movement I work shoulder-to-shoulder with some of the finest people in the world.
  40. My mother—who lost her job because she was pregnant—and my father, who was unemployed—chose life for their baby girl (me).
  41. My daughter.

LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/02/19/after-41-years-of-abortion-heres-41-reasons-im-pro-life/

Transforming Hearts One Pro-Life Meme At A Time

Transforming hearts one pro-life meme at a time

BY SUSANNA ROSE

  • Tue Feb 18, 2014 15:59 EST

February 18, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – When she was only 14 years of age, God put Birgit Jones in a unique position to defend life.  Her innocence was taken from her by a violent 16-year-old neighborhood boy and Birgit soon discovered she was pregnant.

This unthinkable experience occurred in the early 1970s as Roe v. Wade was being discussed in the courts.  Rationalizations for abortion were considered, including the common one for cases of rape and incest.  Birgit’s family saw no possible rationale for killing this innocent baby conceived in rape.

As Birgit writes on her blog, “And now it had hit home. Should a girl really carry her attacker’s child? For this irrevocably Catholic family there was only one answer, ‘yes’! After all, why punish the child for his father’s crime? Wouldn’t that just create another victim? That child had committed no crime, had been convicted by no jury. To give him a death sentence would be the height of injustice.”

She gave birth to a beautiful blue-eyed baby boy and her parents lovingly welcomed him into their home, adopting him as one of their own children.

Birgit bravely pressed on in her life.  She married her high school sweetheart her senior year, going on to graduate from college with a BA in Art.  She and her husband went on to start a family soon after.

When her three children were still young, Birgit began having a desire to become actively involved in pro-life work.  She wrote letters to the editor in her local newspaper and got noticed by people in the pro-life movement.

She was asked to be the first executive director of a local pro-life group in Owensboro, Kentucky but she refused, believing her season of life was to be at home with her children.  They kept asking her and eventually, the time was right.  Her dying mother was the greatest source of encouragement to her in deciding to take the position.

As the years went by, Birgit continued to be an influential pro-life advocate in her community. Her children grew up and two of them have begun families of their own.

She fell in love with her grandchildren and began taking their pictures.  She developed the idea of making the pictures into statements about life. 

Thus, the idea for her pro-life memes was born.  Says Birgit of the memes, “Abortion is not a pretty topic.  But I’ve transformed the way I approach it to be much kinder and gentler.  It’s more about the soft images, the beauty of life.”

She says she recognizes that abortion doesn’t have one identity but is multifaceted.  “I try to win people through their hearts, through their feelings, through their motherhood, their grandmotherhood, and through their siblings,” she says.

Her memes have caught the attention of many on Facebook, Twitter and other social media as well as churches all over the country.  Last year, Birgit was contacted by individuals wishing to showcase some of her memes on display boards at the back of their churches during 40 Days for Life.  This idea inspired Birgit and she was granted permission to begin displaying memes at the back of churches in her diocese.

Birgit is happy to offer her memes on her Facebook page for free use to others.  “It is the kind of craft that needs the appreciation of others in order to be spread,” she says.

When asked how others can use their abilities to spread a pro-life message, she says, “Let your passions and whatever gifts you’ve been given collaborate together and let the Holy Spirit inspire you.” 

“Remember,” she adds, “the outcome belongs to God.”

See Birgit Jones’ pro-life memes on her Facebook page here.

LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/transforming-hearts-one-pro-life-meme-at-a-time

 

She Was Conceived in Incest, Should She Have Been Killed in Abortion?

She Was Conceived in Incest, Should She Have Been Killed in Abortion?

by Monica Kelsey | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 2/18/14 2:28 PM

On a hot summer day in June of 2008 Kristi Hofferber decided it was time to talk to her adoptive parents about getting information about her birth parents. Kristi never felt the need to step back into her past, and always felt unsettled about it. But on this hot day in June 2008 she decided to go back in time and what she found out about her birth parents has become the biggest shock of her life.

Kristi was adopted at birth into a loving home and was raised in the Lutheran church. She grew up knowing she was adopted and was the only child for this young married couple out of Illinois.  She was never sure why her birthmother placed her up for adoption and was never sure if she ever really wanted to know the reason why.

kristihofferber2When Kristi was 13 years old, her adoptive parents read a local newspaper article about a father who had molested his daughter for years and was being charged with rape and molestation of a dependent. The newspaper printed this families name and that’s when Kristis’ parents discovered the truth about Kristis young life. Kristi’s parents were mistakenly given the name of her birth family during the adoption process back in 1978. They decided to keep this information secret until Kristi was old enough to understand and mature enough to handle this kind of information.

For years Kristis’ adoptive parents told her that when she wanted information concerning her birth family, they would sit down with her to discuss it.  Kristi was content in her life and didn’t feel the need to revisit her past.  It wasn’t until Kristi was 30 years old, after being married with a child of their own, she felt God moving her towards finding out about her birth.

“I tried to talk to my mom and dad lots of times about opening my birth records but I felt like I was disrespecting them in some way so I didn’t”.  “When I finally got up enough nerve and they sat me down and told me the truth, I was taken back by what they told me”.

Kristis birth-mother was repeatedly molested by her father and as a result, became pregnant with Kristi.  Out of years of abuse and torture, Kristi became the only survivor of 6 children conceived in incest.  Four of the pregnancies ended in abortion to hide her fathers crime and one forced miscarriage due to abuse.  The abuse went on for almost 20 years until Kristi’s birthmother was strong enough to put an end to it. Kristi’s birthmother/sister finally pressed charges against her father and Kristis birthfather/grandfather went to prison.

One of the questions Kristi gets asked a lot at the events she speaks at is “do you have any physical abnormalities since you were conceived in incest”?  “This makes me laugh because this is why society tells women to abort children conceived in incest”, Kristi says.  ”Like there is going to be something wrong with their child, like I should be purple with green dots or something”. “I am as normal as anyone in this auditorium, I am not an exception I just have an exceptional story”.

Kristi knows that her life is a gift and she is not only lucky to be alive but blessed to be strong enough to tell her birthmothers/sisters story.  Kristi is now speaking out publicly and has joined forces with Pam Stenzel and Monica Kelsey and our organization “Living Exceptions”.

“Living Exceptions” is a non profit organization that is made up of members who are conceived in rape or incest and are educating individuals how to be 100% pro-life with no exceptions.  60% of the pro-life community have a rape/incest exception and Kristi is dedicating her life to educating people in the pro-life movement that being “pro-life” means that all life has value.  You can follow Kristi on her pro-life speaker page at www.facebook.com/kristihofferber. To have Kristi speak at your event please use the contact page on www.livingexceptions.com.

LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/02/18/she-was-conceived-in-incest-should-she-have-been-killed-in-abortion/

How Should Pro-Lifers Talk About Birth Control?

How Should Pro-Lifers Talk About Birth Control?

by Josh Brahm | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 2/18/14 11:19 AM

We’ve been wanting to shoot an episode on this topic for several years, and it’s finally done! It’s sometimes a contentious topic among pro-life people, but it’s an important one nonetheless.

How should pro-life people think and talk about birth control, aside from the important religious debate about whether or not you should plan your family?

Dr. Rich Poupard from Life Training Institute comes on the show to offer his expertise.

birthcontrolQuestions:

  1. How does Plan B work according to the research and what does a woman’s weight have to do with it’s effectiveness?
  2. Do you think women are getting enough information about the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of Plan B?
  3. Why will the new Plan B research probably result in MORE abortifacient use, and not less?
  4. Were pro-abortion-choice advocates talking about the new Plan B/weight study when it came out, or have they been hesitant to discuss it publicly?
  5. What’s the connection between abortifacient IUD’s and implantables and Obamacare?
  6. Knowing everything you know, how would you train pro-life advocates to talk publicly about birth control?
  7. What should pro-lifers talk about when discussing the public policy side of this issue? Parental involvement?
  8. How would you answer in 60-seconds the direct question of whether Plan B causes abortions or not?

BONUS: Click here to hear the questions I asked Dr. Poupard about birth control pills that we didn’t have time to fit into the Life Report episode.

WATCH VIDEO & LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/02/18/how-should-pro-lifers-talk-about-birth-control/

 

Science, Religion, and the Question of When Life Begins

NRL News Today
February 18, 2014   Fetal Development

Science, religion, and the question of when life begins

 By Paul Stark

Unbornbaby93Prof. David Schultz writes:

“When it comes to the issue of abortion, this is not a scientific issue but instead a matter first of theology and then ethics. There is no scientific answer to when life begins. This is a matter of religious faith and I may not choose to agree with the theology that another holds.”

Is there no scientific answer to when life begins? That depends, of course, on what one means by “life.” I and most people (in this context) generally mean biological life, specifically the life of a human organism. That is indeed a scientific question, and the answer is well-established and scientifically uncontested. Presumably Schultz is using “life” to mean a particular moral status (e.g., being a “person,” having a right not to be killed), so “when life begins” is when the human organism acquires (if she does not have it by nature) that moral status, not when the human organism actually comes to be.

Is the moral status of unborn human beings “a matter of religious faith”? Not really — no more so than the moral status of law professor human beings. The question is whether unborn humans, like toddlers, adolescents, grandparents and law professors, deserve full moral respect and ought not be killed for the convenience or benefit of others. Ultimately this question rests on the nature of human value and dignity. It is a moral and philosophical question. (As with any issue — poverty, capital punishment, the environment — many people have religious motivation or grounding for their ethical principles, but that does nothing to disqualify those principles from public consideration.)

Schultz adds:

“To say life begins at conception is a meaningless and empty statement. Just because something is alive and human does not give it moral rights. My kidney is alive and human, does it have moral rights?”

It’s true that merely being alive and human — like a kidney, or the skin cells on the back of my hand — does not say much. But Schultz misses one more biological fact about the unborn (i.e., the human embryo or fetus), a fact that makes the unborn radically different from a human kidney or skin cells: the unborn is a whole (though immature) organism, not a mere part of another. The unborn, from the beginning of his or her existence at conception, is a member of the species Homo sapiens, the same kind of entity as you and me, only at a very early stage of development.

We know this from the science of human embryology. The moral question, as Schultz notes, is separate, and it is what the debate is really about: How should we treat human beings at their earliest developmental stages? Do all human beings, at all stages and in all conditions, have a fundamental right to life, or only some?

LEARN MORE:

http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2014/02/science-religion-and-the-question-of-when-life-begins-3/

From “400 Words for Women”

NRL News Today
February 18, 2014   Unborn Children

From “400 Words for Women”

By Béatrice Fedor

400words

LEARN MORE:

‘House of Cards’ Misses the Mark in Caricaturing Pro-Lifers

‘House of Cards’ misses the mark in caricaturing pro-lifers

BY ANDREW BAIR

  • Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:36 EST

February 17, 2014 (NRLC) – Like millions of others, I spent a good deal of my weekend enjoying the newly released second season of the Netflix original series “House of Cards.” While the political drama captivates the viewer with its twists and turns, it missed the mark in its characterization of pro-life advocates.

Claire Underwood (played by Robin Wright), the wife of Vice President Frank Underwood (played by Kevin Spacey), reveals in a live television interview that she had an abortion. In episodes following the abortion becoming public, pro-life advocates are portrayed not only as angry and hateful–picketing Claire’s events with signs reading “Shame” and “Baby Killer”—but far worse.

Claire’s husband (who Spacey depicts as a viciously amoral power broker) also remarks that a portion of the country sees her as a “baby killer.” She receives death threats and in one episode, a deranged young man tries to bring explosives to her house after he finds out his own wife had an abortion without his knowledge.

But that is not the pro-life movement that I know, or anyone knows outside of Hollywood. That is not the response we give when someone confides in us that they had an abortion.

As pro-life advocates, we acknowledge that in every abortion there are two victims. There is the unborn child who violently loses his or her life and there is also a mother who is forever left to bear the heartache. We care deeply about both of their lives and we want to help both of them.

Pro-life individuals not only run pregnancy resource centers to support pregnant women and their children, but they also coordinate programs aimed at helping women who are struggling with pain and regret after abortion. Her life matters to us before she enters an abortion center and her life matters to us when she comes out.

Organizations like Rachel’s Vineyard and Silent No More were founded in response to women coming forward about their abortions, seeking peace and healing.

Olivia Gans Turner, director of American Victims of Abortion, wrote,

“The post-abortion arm of the pro-life movement was absolutely created by women for women who learned too late what was really at stake in their ‘choice.’ When nobody else could hear us crying in the night we found each other and built places of sanctuary in which to heal.” 

Conversely, abortion centers provide no care for women hurting after abortion. In fact, many abortion advocates even deny negative repercussions are possible. Too often, post-abortive women are pressured to suppress their feelings and suffer in silence.

While I recognize that the purpose of the show is entertainment and often television requires sensationalism, nonetheless we should set the record straight. The pro-life movement is not in the business of casting judgments.

Our goal is to protect lives threatened by abortion. That includes the helpless unborn child, the pregnant mother who finds herself facing difficult circumstances, and the woman grieving after an abortion.

LEARN MORE:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/house-of-cards-misses-mark-in-caricaturing-pro-lifers

 

Former Planned Parenthood Nurse: It was a “Money-Grubbing, Evil, very Sad, Sad Place to Work”

NRL News Today
February 17, 2014   AbortionPPFA

Former Planned Parenthood nurse: It was a “money-grubbing, evil, very sad, sad place to work”

 By Dave Andrusko

Marianne Anderson, former Planned Parenthood nurse

Marianne Anderson, former Planned Parenthood nurse

The no-holds-barred headline captures what Marianne Anderson told reporter Natalie Hoefer: “Former local Planned Parenthood nurse shares her story of walking away from evil.”

The full shocking interview with this former Planned Parenthood nurse can be read online at The Criterion, the newspaper of the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.

Do yourself a favor at read it carefully but not on a full stomach.

What happened, you ask?

According to the interview, when Anderson hired on at the Indianapolis abortion clinic she knew what Planned Parenthood did, although she was “kind of on the fence about abortion.”

Her journey seems to have started when some women came from the national office to teach them the conscious sedation process, described by Hoefer as “allowing clients to purchase mild to moderate sedatives to be given intravenously before an abortion.”

They were so gung-ho, it unnerved Anderson, it would appear.

It was disgusting. These two ladies had this chant they would do: ‘Abortion all the time!’ I thought, ‘I’ve got to get out of here.’ That was about six to eight months after I started.

“Those women from New York acted like an abortion was a rite of passage. They were like, ‘How can you not offer abortion to women? It’s their body. They should be able to do whatever they want. How can you force them to have a baby? Abortion should be free to anybody, anytime.’ ”

Worse yet there were real medical problems for the women, Anderson said, including one girl who “almost bled out. She was passing clots, her blood pressure was dropping.” (She explained that often this was a reaction to the sedation or excessive bleeding.) And, of course, mum was the word when something went wrong.

“When we had to call 911 for an ambulance, we were told never to say the word ‘abortion’ because they don’t want that broadcast. They knew that the calls were recorded, and could be made public.”

Anderson described the abortion clinic as a “money-grubbing, evil, very sad, sad place to work” where they’d be reminded.

“in our weekly staff meeting that we need to tell everyone [who called to schedule an appointment] to avoid ‘those people’ [the sidewalk counselors] because we need the money. We were to tell them, ‘Don’t make eye contact with them, and don’t stop in the driveway. If you make eye contact with them or if you stop and roll down your window, they’re going to try their darnedest to talk you out of it.’

And as you read in other accounts of former abortion clinic workers, the pressure to keep the abortion numbers up was unrelenting. Anderson said they were told

“You have to have so many [abortions] a month to stay open. In our meetings they’d tell us, ‘If abortions are down, you could get sent home early and not get as many hours.’

That pressure to keep the coffers filled resulted in law-breaking, according to Anderson, for example, allowing “girls to have ultrasounds that were obviously way too far along.”

She added,

“They said, ‘If they want to be seen, you just put them through, no problem,’ just taking advantage to make money.

“I was always getting in trouble for talking too long to the girls, asking if they were sure they wanted to do this.

“It was absolutely miserable going in there.”

It’s important that you read the interview in its entirety so let me end with this.

Anderson is asked, “What experiences stick with you?”

“One young girl came in with her mom. She was about 16. Her mom had made the appointment. That’s not supposed to be how it works. It’s supposed to only be the patient who makes the appointment. I checked her in, and she thought she was there for a prenatal checkup. The mom was pushing it. She blindsided her own daughter.

“This guy brought in a Korean girl. I had no doubt in my mind this girl was a sex slave. This guy would not leave her side. They could barely communicate. He wanted to make all the arrangements.

“During the ultrasound, she told one of the nurses that there were lots of girls in the house, and that the man hits them. She never came back for the abortion. I always wondered what happened to her. One of my co-workers said, ‘You’re better off to just let it go.’

“These girls would start crying on the table, and [the abortion doctor for whom Anderson worked] would say, ‘Now you chose to be here. Sit still. I don’t have time for this.’

“One doctor, when he was in the POC [products of conception] room, would talk to the aborted baby while looking for all the parts. ‘Come on, little arm, I know you’re here! Now you stop hiding from me!’ It just made me sick to my stomach.

“The sound the suction machine made when it turned on still haunts me.”

I have had many conversations with co-workers about the men (it’s typically men) who abort babies like they were working on a “meat-market style assembly line” (as two nurses who once worked at a Delaware Planned Parenthood abortion clinic testified last year). They are often really bizarre, disturbed individuals and “talking” to the remains of the baby they have just torn apart comes as no surprise.

Take time to read “Former local Planned Parenthood nurse shares her story of walking away from evil

Please join those who are following me on Twitter at twitter.com/daveha. Send your comments todaveandrusko@gmail.com.

LEARN MORE: