Monthly Archives: December 2013

No denying it now – Americans will be forced to pay for abortions

Susan B. Anthony List
Pro-life Friend,

On March 22, 2010 – the day after Obamacare was passed by the House of Representatives after so-called pro-life Democrats caved – I wrote to SBA List members saying:

“For the first time since Roe, Americans will be forced to pay for abortions. Tens of thousands of additional babies will die as a result.”

Flash forward over three years later to this week, when the Associated Press ran the following headline:

Abortion covered in most health plans for Congress.”

In between my words in 2010 and the AP story this past week, the SBA List was called a liar for saying that Obamacare would expand and fund abortion. As you know, we’ve even been sued by an ex-Congressman in federal court for defamation over the issue.

But now, as Obamacare continues to be implemented, there is NO denying that it is the largest expansion of abortion on-demand since Roe v. Wade – and it’s being funded with your tax dollars.

Send an email to your elected officials right now and tell them to STOP taxpayer funding of abortion under Obamacare IMMEDIATELY.

The latest news is startling:

Of the 112 health insurance plans offered to Members of Congress and their staffs under Obamacare, 103 of them cover elective abortion.

And remember: These plans are being subsidized with YOUR tax dollars.

This comes on top of the report issued by our education and research arm, the Charlotte Lozier Institute, which estimates that up to 111,500 abortions will be subsidized PER YEAR under Obamacare. What’s worse, the Lozier Institute has detailed how it is nearly impossible for Americans to figure out which Obamacare plans cover elective abortion, and which ones do not.

Pro-life Friend, enough is enough: E-mail your elected officials right now and demand that they take action to end taxpayer funding of abortion in Obamacare.

Now is the time to turn up the heat – as the implementation of Obamacare continues to falter, it is becoming a bigger and bigger liability for Members of Congress who backed it.

They need to hear from YOU right now.

It doesn’t matter how long it takes – the SBA List will not stop fighting until taxpayer funding of abortion under Obamacare is stopped.

But we MUST have your help to do it.

Take just one minute and e-mail your elected officials right now.

And after you’ve taken action, forward this e-mail to as many of your like-minded friends and family as possible so they can take action, too.

Thank you for your perseverance in this battle. I’ll be sure to keep you posted on the latest disturbing Obamacare developments.

For Life,

Marjorie Dannenfelser
President, Susan B. Anthony List

PS: The latest Obamacare development is this: Of the 112 health insurance plans offered to Members of Congress and their staffs under Obamacare, 103 of them cover elective abortion. This is outrageous, and is just another example of how Obamacare is a massive expansion of abortion, funded with our tax dollars. Contact your elected officials right now and tell them enough is enough!

New film ‘Gimme Shelter’ smashes false image of pro-life homes for pregnant teens

New film ‘Gimme Shelter’ smashes false image of pro-life homes for pregnant teens

BY JOHN-HENRY WESTEN

The film is Gimme Shelter. And countering the trend in most of Hollywood, this new movie focuses on women’s teen shelters, which encourage young mothers-to-be to decide to have their babies.

After taking a beating by mainstream media, which have sought to paint crisis pregnancy centers and pro-life homes for pregnant mothers as manipulative, a new film is set to smash that false image.Gimme Shelter, which is based-on-a-true-story, is a star-studded and entertaining production that will both attract and educate older teens and adults alike.

Gritty and realistic, the story revolves around Agnes “Apple” Bailey (Vanessa Hudgens), a 16-year-old who was taken into state custody as a baby when her mom was found unfit. Transferred from numerous foster homes, Apple is reunited with her mom, impressively played by Rosario Dawson, only to realize that she remains as broken and abusive as ever.

Apple’s attempt to again break free leaves her homeless and eventually hospitalized. It is in the hospital where she meets a compassionate priest (James Earl Jones), who is able to guide her to the safety and the welcome arms of a pro-life shelter for pregnant young women. The amazing love shown to Apple from the home’s foundress (Ann Dowd) and the other girls makes for a touching, gripping, and powerful drama.

Gimme Shelter uses as a backdrop the value of protecting the lives of the unborn. On its face it is an amazing testimony to the work and dedication of people of faith who provide not only material goods and services but also the emotional and spiritual support needed to be open to life.

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/new-film-gimme-shelter-smashes-false-image-of-pro-life-homes-for-pregnant-t

‘He killed my baby, he killed my baby!’: The day I lost my daughter to the Culture of Death

‘He killed my baby, he killed my baby!’: The day I lost my daughter to the Culture of Death

BY JASON JONES

  • Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:56 EST
  • Tags: Abortion

Me during my days in the army.

Dec. 9, 2013 (StudentsforLife) – It was two days before my seventeenth birthday, a Saturday morning, the day after a football game in which I’d played. So I was tired and sore, but I could smell breakfast coming from downstairs and somebody was walking up the stairs. I was half asleep. The door opened: it was my girlfriend, I smiled, of course—but from the look on her face I could see that this wasn’t called for. This was a serious moment. I steeled myself.

After a few long seconds, she looked up at me and said, “I’m pregnant.” That woke me up quick. We sat there in my bedroom, two young teenagers. My room was still a boy’s place, hung with football posters, sneakers, and baseball gloves strewn across the floor. But there I was, sitting next to my pregnant girlfriend. I knew all of a sudden I’d lost the right to keep on being just a boy. My girlfriend went to an all-girls Catholic school and looked ahead to college, while I was dreaming of college football and a career in the NFL. We each had a plan for our lives. It was time to scrap those plans.

We strategized together figuring out how to take care of the new life we created. It felt completely natural and, incomprehensibly, even a little exciting: Our adult lives were starting much sooner than we had planned, but we’d figure it out. So here’s what we decided: I could drop out of high school to join the army (a friend of mine had just done the same). My girlfriend would keep things secret, wear baggy sweaters and take vitamins until I got back from basic training and then we would be together—and I’d take care of all three of us.

So that’s what we did. I went to the recruiter’s office; I got the paperwork, which I needed my mother and my high school principal to sign. Now, out of five hundred and sixty-five students at Amos Alonzo Stagg High School, I was number five hundred and sixty-five. So my principal was quite happy to sign that piece of paper. My mother, with five kids, was also quick to sign the paper, with very few questions asked.

When I got to basic training, I didn’t go to church. I tried to once, but it was just too much for me to bear. In fact, I realized I’d rather do anything else. So I asked the drill sergeants, “When the rest of you guys go to church, can I stay back and clean something?” They agreed, so I took on pots and pans duty, which nobody wanted. I discovered that the station was right next to a freezer where the drill sergeants would hide ice cream bars. I realized that if I took those ice cream bars, packed them in buckets of ice, and snuck them upstairs, when the soldiers came back from church I could trade them. “You shine my shoes for a week? Okay, here’s an ice cream bar. You polish my brass for a week? Okay, here’s an ice cream bar. You make my bed….” And so skipping church turned out to mean that I didn’t have to polish my brass, shine my shoes, or make my bed. Not the best start for my moral education….

I was almost finished with basic and advanced infantry training and getting ready to graduate, and go home. I’ll never forget the day—it was a Sunday when I was cleaning pots and pans while everybody else was busy praying. A friend came running in and said, “Jones, your girlfriend’s on the phone and she’s crying.” So I ran out, knowing that I wasn’t supposed to leave my station or answer the phone. But I picked it up, and she was crying, as I have never heard a woman cry before. Ever. The only way that I can explain it is that her soul was crying. And she kept saying over and over and over again, “I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m sorry. It wasn’t me.” And then her father said, “Jason,” over the other line, “I know your secret, and your secret’s gone. She had an abortion.”

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/call-the-police-my-girlfriends-father-killed-my-child-i-lost-my-baby-to-the

Guilt and Shame Over A Girlfriend’s Secret Abortion

NRL News Today
December 4, 2013   Abortion

Guilt and Shame over a girlfriend’s secret abortion

 

By Dave Andrusko

man8The beauty of the Internet is that you can stumble across fascinating stories that come (from your vantage point) from obscure sources. Such was the case yesterday—what appears to be an advice column (“Dear Alison”) that appears in a newspaper in Staffordshire, England.

A man writes Alison of The Stokes Sentinel to tell her of a girlfriend from college who, after 15 years, had contacted him on Facebook. She’s left just before finals—and he never knew why.

“She eventually told me why she left, that she was pregnant with our child, knew I wouldn’t support her, had an abortion and became very depressed and attempted suicide before getting her life back on track,” he wrote. He felt guilty both for treating her so badly at the time (he’d cheated on her and stood her up) and also because “she had gone through all of that, on her own and largely because of me.”

The writer concludes, “Since she told me I have been off sick from work and my friends are worried about me, but I’m too ashamed to tell them what is going on.

There appears to be a lot going on in this man’s mind. His sense of support seems inverted. He should feel ashamed not because he hadn’t known she was pregnant and therefore could not have gone with her to the abortion clinic but because there is nothing to suggest (I think) that he would have tried to persuade her not to abort their child.

He also appears at some level to understand the gravity of what the abortion did to his ex-girlfriend. He may be fishing for pity (or expiation), but he may also be honestly regretting what the abortion had done to her, even if the fate of the baby is never discussed.

Except by “Alison.” On the one hand she says, “I am glad to hear that you have changed and you find that young man unrecognizable.” On the other hand she concludes, “Counselling would help you to come to terms with this and deal with the loss of your child.”

Obviously we know only the barest outlines of the story that led to the baby’s death. But while the timeframe may be unusual—not finding out about the abortion for 15 years—a man subsequently learning of a secret abortion is not.

Every man is different, of course, but learning that a woman you were involved with aborted your child can and does tear you up. Every time we run a story about men and abortion, someone (or more than one man) will send me an email filled with pain and regret and remorse.

That is true, moreover, whether the man is convinced he would have “stood by” her decision to abort or would have tried everything in his power to dissuade her.

Abortion’s aftermath is something we write about all the time. But it applies not just to women but to the men in their lives as well.

Read More: http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2013/12/guilt-and-shame-over-a-girlfriends-secret-abortion

 

Kill The Pain, Not The Patient: A 17-year-old Speaks Out On Euthanasia

Kill the pain, not the patient: A 17-year-old speaks out on euthanasia

BY LIA MILLS

December 5, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – I first heard the slogan “Death with Dignity” when I was 13. Even in my youth, the phrase didn’t sit well with me. And, as I researched it, I came to a solid conclusion: euthanasia was wrong. Many said I was brainwashed and naïve and that my views would develop and mature as I grew older.

Well, I’m not exactly old, but four years later, I can say that, although I have developed and matured, my conclusion has not changed.

Lia Mills

Lia Mills

The slogan “death with dignity” is a lovely illusion. The concept behind its birth appears flawlessly kind. It holds that controversial yet alluring “logic” that dances around the idea of ethics and goes straight for the jugular of emotion. But it is for this reason that we should be warned.

Euthanasia advocates are practiced in the ways of the heart. They know how to tug on heartstrings, how to pull out raw emotion, and how to toy with human instincts. They need raw emotion because their arguments hold little appeal to the mind.

Consider, on the other hand, the arguments against euthanasia. These look at past experience with euthanasia, which has proven that there can never be enough safeguards put in place to ensure that no one dies an unwilling victim under the guise of “voluntary” euthanasia.

They also point out that elder abuse is all too real an issue to ignore. They point out that those who suffer from mental illness, like clinical depression, could easily slip through the restraints surrounding euthanasia and be gone before anyone can give them the help they really needed.

They point out that the chance of unwanted infants being enveloped under euthanasia laws is not only a possibility but is a current reality in some countries, throwing open the question of “who will be next?” They point to the fact that, where euthanasia is legalized, advances in palliative care stagnate. All these arguments are based on hard facts, not manipulative emotional pleas.

And, yet, those who oppose euthanasia also appeal to the heart. They appeal to the real need that lies within each person to be told that their life matters, no matter what its current state, and that there is hope, no matter how dark the current situation. It is a position that actively pursues palliative care instead of merely offering lethal doses and body bags.

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kill-the-pain-not-the-patient-a-17-year-old-speaks-out-on-euthanasia

Planned Parenthood employee arrested for sexual battery for fondling patient, police say

Planned Parenthood employee arrested for sexual battery for fondling patient, police say

BY BEN JOHNSON

SACRAMENTO, CA, December 5, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Police in Sacramento have arrested a medical assistant at a Planned Parenthood facility for allegedly sexually touching a patient.

Jorge Martin-Santana, 28, has been charged with sexual battery, a misdemeanor.

The Sacramento Police Department issued a warrant for his arrest Tuesday and say he turned himself in the next day.

Jorge Martin-Santana

Jorge Martin-Santana

Police in California’s capital city investigated the complaint, which was made in October, with Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office.

It was not immediately clear which of Planned Parenthood’s three Sacramento clinics Martin-Santana worked at. Two of the three are abortion facilities.

Investigators believe, but are not certain, that Martin-Santana victimized only one patient.

Although not widely reported, mothers have faced sexual misconduct or abuse at abortion facilities worldwide.

Numerous abortionists have been accused or convicted of sexually abusing their patients, includingDr. Brian FinkelDr. Rodolfo FinkelsteinLaurence Reich, and Dr. Narendra Sharma.

Another California abortionist, Laurence Reich, had been accused of sexual molestation in 1982 before pleading “no contest” to four charges in 1984. He finally lost his license in 2006 after another round of sexual battery and misconduct charges.

In 2003, a jury convicted Arizona abortionist Brian Finkel of Arizona was convicted of 24 counts of sexual abuse.

Last November, the Oregon State Board of Nursing (OSBN) issued an order banning abortion nurse Evett Gradwohl from “practicing as a Registered Nurse in any capacity or functioning as a caregiver in any setting” after hearing allegations that she had sexually molested anesthetized abortion patients at Lovejoy Surgicenter in Portland, Oregon.

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-employee-arrested-for-sexual-battery-for-fondling-p

”Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women” is a comprehensive, scholarly examination of the damage abortion does to women

NRL News Today
December 5, 2013   Abortion

”Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women” is a comprehensive, scholarly examination of the damage abortion does to women

By Dave Andrusko

abortionimpact4Like most everyone who writes for a living, I receive many invitations to attend conferences and book launchings. I’m too busy to attend any and, to be honest, it’s rare that I regret not being able to be there in person.

The exception was the kickoff for a new book written by pro-life physicians and scholars—“Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women.” In a word, abortion’s impact has been devastating, as significant as it is largely unrecognized by the wider public.

The 400+ page book is published by our Canadian friends at The deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research. Those who have read NRL News Today may remember our review of an earlier, equally thorough book by the non-profit think-tank—“Women’s Health after Abortion: The Medical and Psychological Evidence.”

“Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women” is the kind of must-read book that is best consumed a chapter at a time. It is built on over 100 interviews with women who have had abortions and includes contributions from physicians, psychiatrists, and researchers.

Compiled and analyzed by a Trifecta of authors–Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, Dr. Ian Gentles and Dr. Elizabeth-Ring Cassidy—this ten-years-in-the-making book is divided into four major sections: “The Big Picture”; “The Medical Impact”; “The Psychological and Social Impact”; and “Women’s Voices.”

The Introduction’s first paragraph summarizes what the next 21 chapters will document:

“For all three authors the driving force behind this book is the concern about the ill effects—largely unknown, and for the most part unpublicized—of induced abortion on women. After several years of intense research we are more than ever persuaded of the urgency of communication this information to medical professional, counselors, and to women who are contemplating having an abortion.”

The book brings new dimensions to the word “rigorous.” It’s built on more than 650 papers, books, and official documents that examine abortion world-wide.

“This book comes as an enormous relief to many of us who have been studying abortion for decades,“ explains Dr. Priscilla Coleman, PhD, professor at Bowling Green University, who contributed a chapter to the book. “Finally, there is a credible, evidence-based resource to inform medicine, psychology, and law. Moreover, the science is now available in a condensed and easily accessible form to women facing difficult pregnancies and coping with ill-effects of abortion.”

For those who read NRL News Today, it will come as no surprise that a thorough vetting of the research on abortion’s after-shocks would run counter to the statements of institutions, public and private, who have failed at their job of looking out for the safety of women.

That truth shows up again and again in “Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women.” For example, one of Dr. Lanfranchi’ s chapters, “Biology and epidemiology confirm the abortion-breast cancer link,” is an exquisite explanation why there MUST be an increase in a woman’s risk of having breast cancer if she has an induced abortion. Equally well, she debunks the customary naysayers, including the National Cancer Institute.

The book extensively examines the evidence that abortion has considerable psychological implications for women, which pro-abortionists and their enablers adamantly deny. The authors write that they “provide solid documentation, from several counters that challenge the statement of the American Psychological Association that induced abortion has no adverse psychological effects upon women.”

Read More: http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2013/12/complications-abortions-impact-on-women-is-a-comprehensive-scholarly-examination-of-the-damage-abortion-does-to-women

Unborn baby destroys mother’s cancer, “he saved his mummy’s life”

NRL News Today
December 5, 2013   Internationalpregnancy

Unborn baby destroys mother’s cancer, “he saved his mummy’s life”

By Dave Andrusko

Nicola Weller and son, Brandon

Nicola Weller and son, Brandon

In 2010 Nicola Weller went into the hospital to remove a tumor from her womb. As she told the British newspaper, The Daily Mail recently, “I was absolutely devastated. My world just fell apart. My daughter was four years old, and I was being told that I was facing cancer. It was terrifying to think that I may leave her without a mum.”

But as a nurse at Dorset County Hospital in Southwest England was performing a scan to locate the tumor, she abruptly left the room. When she returned with three radiologists, they informed her the tumor had disappeared!

“They then broke the news to Mrs. Weller that she was seven weeks pregnant,” Lucy Laing reported. “The pregnancy hormones had caused her tumour to disappear.”

Mrs. Weller told Laing, “‘I was stunned to find out I was expecting a baby – but even more stunned to hear that this baby had caused my tumour to disappear. It was like he had been sent from above to save my life.”

Doctors closely monitored her pregnancy but no further treatment was required and her son Brandon, now three, was born September 2010, at 7Ib 8oz. “none the worse for his experience.”

Mrs. Weller had not intended to become pregnant, “So getting pregnant was a miracle in itself,” she told Laing “[B]ut to find that my unborn baby had caused this tumour to disappear was a further miracle. All that was left on the scan was a few blobs of blood floating around. There was no other sign of it. My baby ended up saving my life. Without him I may not have been here today.”

According to Laing, Mrs. Weller was referred to Bridport Community Hospital in Dorset, England for a scan after discovering swelling under her rib in September 2009. She was told her there was a tumour growing around her womb and she needed an operation to remove it.

It was then that the miraculous sequence began.

Read More: http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2013/12/unborn-baby-destroys-mothers-cancer-he-saved-his-mummys-life

ACLU sues U.S. bishops over policy forbidding Catholic hospitals from doing abortions

ACLU sues U.S. bishops over policy forbidding Catholic hospitals from doing abortions

BY DUSTIN SIGGINS

DETROIT, MI, December 3, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – On Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) opened a new front in the culture wars with a lawsuit against the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) alleging that the USCCB’s directives prohibiting abortions in Catholic hospitals are equal to medical negligence.

The lawsuit focuses on the case of Tamesha Means, who in 2010 was brought to Mercy Health Partners, a Catholic-affiliated hospital in Muskegon County, Michigan after her water broke at 18 weeks.

Mercy Health Partners Hospital in Muskegon

In the lawsuit, Means claims she visited Mercy three times after her water broke, and that by the third visit she had an infection, but the hospital tried to discharge her anyway. During the discharge she began to give birth, at which point she was treated. The baby died shortly after birth.

The ACLU claims that the appropriate care in the case would have been to induce labor to avoid the chance of infection, since the baby had a slim chance of survival. But because of the USCCB’s Ethical & Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, it claims, the hospital was prevented from treating Means in the proper way. Because Means’ baby was pre-term, inducing labor would have virtually ensured the death of the child.

The USCCB’s directives state that “abortion…is never permitted. Every procedure whose sole immediate effect is the termination of pregnancy before viability is an abortion…” The lawsuit is targeting the USCCB, not Mercy. It also names as defendants the current and two former chairs of the Catholic Health Ministries, which requires Mercy to abide by the Religious Directives.

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/aclu-sues-u.s.-bishops-over-policy-forbidding-catholic-hospitals-from-doing

Yes, Obamacare Is Rationing

National Right to Life

Yes, It Is Rationing

It’s four years overdue, but America is finally beginning to have the debate about Obamacare we were promised. Barack Obama had assured us – another in his long series of broken promises – that the meetings held to devise the plan would be televised on C-SPAN.  Americans would have every opportunity to know what the law is, and how it would affect them.

That never happened.  The law was put together behind closed doors.  Nancy Pelosi later arrogantly told us “we have to pass the law so you can know what’s in it.”

Now we’re finding out.

National Right to Life was a lone early voice exposing how the law would cause rationing of life-saving care.  But Obamacare supporters have mocked the claim.  Their standard line has been “the ACA is designed to expand coverage, not reduce it.”

But that’s only one part of the law.  Central to this overhaul of our healthcare system is a harsh regime of rationing – denial of careAnd it’s finally being admitted.


            Americans don’t yet realize the law will prevent you from spending
your own money to get treatments deemed “ineffective” in an Orwellian way
by the unelected, largely unaccountable IPAB board.

Last summer, former Vermont governor, Democratic presidential candidate, physician and Obamacare supporter Howard Dean made headlines when he spilled the beans.  The Independent Payment Advisory Board set up by Obamacare, Dean said, was “essentially a health care rationing board.”

Further clarification about the role of this board, known as IPAB, came in a series of interviews and tweets last week by Time magazine Senior Political Analyst Mark Halperin.  Coming from an avowed supporter of universal coverage, as Halperin is, the interviews were very instructive, containing insights every American should know.

Halperin first discussed rationing on a November 25th Newsmax TV program.  “It’s built into the plan.  It’s not like a guess or like a judgment.  That’s going to be part of how costs are controlled.”

Later that day, Halperin clarified in a tweet that his comments were not about so-called “death panels,” as the show’s host had termed it, but about rationing.  This is an important distinction for pro-lifers to understand so we (unlike Obama) are completely clear and honest about what the Affordable Care Act does when we discuss it with others.

“Death Panels” vs. broad government-generated rationing in the ACA

The British National Health Service (NHS) has appeals committees to review “individual funding requests.”  They meet to determine whether treatments in a specific case will or won’t be paid for by the government health care system, NHS.  These have sometimes been termed “death panels” because if a patient needs a treatment to save or extend his life and can’t afford to pay for it himself, a verdict of “no” by the committee means the patient could die – hence, the term “death panel.”

Obamcare’s Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) will not operate this way.  It won’t review individual cases; in fact, the law is written to preclude this type of direct rationing.  That’s why some Obamacare supporters protest that the law actually bars IPAB from rationing.

But Obamacare actually gives IPAB far more power to ration than if it was acting as judge and jury to individual patients Broadly speaking, IPAB is given sweeping powers to recommend to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) whether and how whole categories of treatments are to be reimbursed – and is required to use these powers to prevent overall health care spending from being allowed even to keep up with medical inflation Thus, they can (in fact, it is their job to) limit reimbursement and ration care from thousands or millions of people at a time. 

For example, IPAB might decide that a new, promising treatment for breast cancer is not “cost-effective,” given the board’s calculation of the number of lives it might save versus the cost to offer the treatment.  HHS might then issue a “quality measure” binding on health care providers that does not authorize use of the treatment.

Effectively, HHS would have the power to drive most doctors out of business if they ignore its directives to ration.  Women who might have been saved by the new treatment would die if the older, cheaper treatments don’t cure them.

Halperin was open about the law’s intention to ration in a follow-up interview on CNBC last Tuesday.

“Those decisions that are made by that board are going to lead to what I think could be described perfectly reasonably as rationing, “ Halperin said.  “Again, as I said, that’s built into the system.”

“The Independent Payment Advisory Board, which is a big part of the Affordable Care Act that is central to cost control, is something that hasn’t been debated in a real way . . . we need to have that debate in this country.”

Currently, if an insurance company, doctor or hospital denies you a treatment or payment for a treatment, you have several options.  States have insurance commissions to which you have a right to appeal payment denials by insurance companies.  You can go to another doctor or hospital to get care.

Under Obamacare, these avenues will be largely closed off to you and your loved ones.  If the government says you can’t get a treatment, your current ability to appeal to a government body will be curtailed.  And Americans don’t yet realize the law will prevent you from spending your own money to get treatments deemed in an Orwellian way “ineffective” by the unelected, largely unaccountable IPAB board.   

That makes it absolutely critical that National Right to Life inform Americans, warn Americans, empower Americans to overturn this law that will be so deadly to so many of their loved ones – and ultimately to many of us.  Please take the time to see one way we’re spreading the truth about Obamacare rationing at www.nrlc.org/medethics/healthcarerationing.

And please help National Right to Life fight this life-and-death battle with a generous donation today.  Perhaps you can afford a substantial gift of $1,000 or $500 – such a contribution will help us get the word out to the public and public officials alike about what this law does to innocent human lives and why it must be overturned.

Your gifts of $100, $50 or $35, combined with those of thousands of other concerned Americans, can have the same effect.  Let’s not let it be said that we didn’t fight back with everything we have to overturn those policies and save these lives!

Thank you – you are literally a Lifesaver!

Carol Tobias,
National Right to Life President