Real women don’t like lust

October 15, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – I am compelled to write this article, “Real Women Don’t Like Lust”, in response to the various media (movies, magazines, music, television and print) continually promoting and falsely characterizing women as sex objects and as insatiable wild lusty types while in reality all the emphasis on ‘sex’ and ‘sexy’ and ‘sex lives’ separated from real meaning and purpose is having the exact opposite effect- driving couples further apart and in the long run making women feel kind of pukey about it all.

I’ve become so frustrated by these dishonest, inaccurate and harmful portrayals of truly beautiful and life-bearing woman and the obnoxious emphasis on the errant notion of a ‘sex life’ that I came up with the following to express my thoughts:

There should be no such thing as a sex life.
There is “married life” and within it, the many expressions of love
which includes the physical renewal of the wedding vows.

Personally, I am just sick to death of ‘sexy’.  When a person looks ‘sexy’, doesn’t it means they look ready for sex?  I thought only prostitutes were supposed to look like that.  Ladies, how about some new adjectives?  How about…. BEAUTIFUL? How about…. LOVELY? How about ELEGANT?

Click “like” to support Catholics Restoring the Culture!

I received the testimony below from a woman who has experienced that very aversion that happens to women over time in this culture.  She enthusiastically relates what a difference moral family planning (a.k.a.- the practice of chastity in marriage) has made in the intimate area of their marriage and in her attitude toward the renewal of their wedding vows:

More: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/real-women-dont-like-lust

7 Spectacular Pieces Of Pro-Life Art, Sculpture Around the World

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 10/14/13 12:29 PM

• Print
• Email

The pro-life movement continues to make use of listicles at social media website Buzzfeed. In its latest piece, Personhood USA posts seven amazing and spectacular pieces of pro-life art depicting the development of unborn babies.

“These eye-popping masterpieces come from around the world! Check out the fantastic art that shows human life in the womb is precious,” the organization says. The remainder of the piece appears below:

Miss World 2013 Megan Young: “I’m Against Abortion,” and “Sex is for Marriage”
Megan Lynne Young, a 23-year-old Filipino American beauty queen recently won the Miss World Philippines title and was later crowned as Miss World 2013 in Bali, Indonesia.

She is the first Filipina to win the title of Miss World but she also has another claim to fame: she is pro-life.

“I’m against abortion,” she says in a new interview. “I’m pro-life and if it means killing someone who’s already there, then I’m against that, of course. My beliefs are, no abortion.”

“Sex is for marriage, that is my belief,” she adds.

More: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/14/miss-world-2013-megan-young-im-against-abortion-and-sex-is-for-marriage/

Statewide Newspaper Editorial

Debate Abortion Rules on Merits

To Interested Parties:

Ogden Newspapers, which publishes numerous newspapers across Ohio (from Lorain, to Warren, to Marietta), wrote the following editorial regarding the recent ACLU lawsuit against our new pro-life laws.  The Editorial states that the ACLU lawsuit is “ridiculous”. 

http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/590986/Debate-Abortion-Rules-on-Merits.html?nav=511

Debate Abortion Rules on Merits

October 13, 2013

The Intelligencer

Save | Comments (4) | Post a comment |

Pro-abortion forces in Ohio went ballistic over the General Assembly’s enactment of three new rules affecting the practice. Now the American Civil Liberties Union is weighing in with a lawsuit attempting to have the rules rescinded.

Are ACLU lawyers pointing out some basic injustice in the rules? No. Have they even found an obscure infringement upon civil liberties? No.

Instead, the ACLU is basing its objection on a bureaucratic technicality.

When lawmakers approved a new state budget earlier this year, they included many amendments on a wide range of matters. Among them were three sections involving abortions.

One merely requires abortion clinics to provide patients with basic information – including whether the fetus has a heartbeat. Another amendment prohibits public hospitals from having transfer agreements with abortion clinics. The third restricts state funding for organizations that promote abortions.

Ohio’s constitution requires legislation be limited to a “single subject,” and that rule was broken by including abortion provisions in the budget bill, ACLU attorneys argue. That is the civil liberties group’s sole grounds for objecting to the rules.

We, too, have objected to state and federal legislators slipping unrelated items into bills. But it has become common practice. And budget bills, by definition, affect every aspect of government.

If the ACLU wants to debate the rules on their merits, fine. But the lawsuit is ridiculous in the context of modern government. It should be dismissed.

___________________________________________

Family Research Council

Tony Perkins’ Washington Update

October 09, 2013 – Wednesday

Obamacare Exchanges Hide Info on Abortion Coverage, Mandatory Abortion Surcharge

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 10/12/13 3:16 AM

With the exchanges of Obamacare activated this month, it has become evident that it is nearly impossible for individuals to try to determine which exchange plans on their state exchange, if any, exclude abortion, said a group of lawmakers at a bipartisan press conference Wednesday.

U.S. Rep. Chris Smith (NJ-04) unveiled his legislation, H.R. 3279, the “Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act” —cosponsored by 70 other Members of the House—to ensure full disclosure of abortion coverage, requiring prominent and transparent disclosure of abortion coverage for each plan offered on an exchange. This is crucial information for millions of Americans since the many plans that include elective abortion are required by law to impose a monthly mandatory abortion surcharge. Many Americans object to paying a surcharge into a fund to be used solely for the purpose of aborting unborn babies.

Smith said the inauguration of the Obamacare exchanges reveals that many health insurance plans throughout the nation will include abortion on demand—even late term abortions. Smith recalled that in October 2009, President Obama said in a speech to a joint session of Congress that, “under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortion… .” A week after the Obamacare rollout, many are now discovering that—contrary to solemn promises made by the President himself—Obamacare violates the Hyde Amendment by funding plans that include abortion.

More:  http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/12/obamacare-exchanges-hide-info-on-abortion-coverage-mandatory-abortion-surcharge/